Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

484

Like as an open question can you guys tell me about the Holodomor and USS Liberty as your perspective.

Some guys speak about the Holodomor being a Ukrainian Famine - my understanding was it was more to do with the Gulags.

And some other dude was trying to argue that in the USS Liberty, the US was on uncertain terms with Israel already and that's why Israel attacked the US ship but the reason the US didn't respond was because the US wanted to stay in the good graces of the UK and France where it wouldn't if it responded to the attacks from Israel (this being before the US was considered a "Super power")

Like as an open question can you guys tell me about the Holodomor and USS Liberty as your perspective. Some guys speak about the Holodomor being a Ukrainian Famine - my understanding was it was more to do with the Gulags. And some other dude was trying to argue that in the USS Liberty, the US was on uncertain terms with Israel already and that's why Israel attacked the US ship but the reason the US didn't respond was because the US wanted to stay in the good graces of the UK and France where it wouldn't if it responded to the attacks from Israel (this being before the US was considered a "Super power")

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Your title doesn't match your content at all.

You bring forth the idea of a shift but then simply ask an open question to get us to do the work for you?

[–] • 0 pt

No, my question is based on my (possibly miss-)understanding of the topics.

[–] • 3 pts

Anyones misunderstanding of any topic does not a shift of the entire internet make.

[–] • 1 pt

A great shift from what to what?

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not sure subtle topics like you say "the kikes did x which means y kicked them out" and then someone comes back as says "No 'z' happened because of 'a'".

I have no doubt I maybe misunderstood or misread somethings but it seems a lot has changed...

Like with the holodomor my understanding was like 130 million died. My understanding was they were Russians however I'm being told they were Ukranians. It could be that they were referenced as "Soviets" and my tard-brain made the connection that they were just Russians.

[–] • 1 pt

16-20 million Ukrainians. 130 million seems a bit much, it's several times the current total population of Ukraine.

[–] • 0 pt

Maybe the 130 million I'm thinking died were actually in the gulags...

Don't know why 130 million is floating about in my brain for a death toll of some communist agenda. Maybe I'm just going mad.

[–] • 1 pt

Fuck off, kike

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah well arguing with half the logic here sometimes makes you come across as sounding like a nigger and arguing in here is only an echo-chamber that will slowly die by attrition. Arguing with improperly sourced and neither referenced evidence makes you sound like the ranting conspiracy theorists they declare you to be.

If your arguments have a good source then it does more to support what you have to say than just "Fuck off, kike."

[–] • 1 pt

Someone argues with my ignorance, this place is an echo-chamber that will slowly die by attrition”

lol

[–] • 0 pt

I will admit to being ignorant, it's impossible for someone to know everything, and generally what I'm trying to do is make other people know about the kikery that's going on in hopes they wake the fuck up.

[–] • 1 pt

Look you fucking heeb, anyone who has done ANY level of research or even a fucking google search has the answers to these questions. Sitting here asking these "questions" is just a way to attempt to sow discord amoung us. it won't work. So I will kindly reiterate: Fuck off, kike.

we got a sleeper kike up in here

[–] • 0 pt

I'm asking advice in a thing we call conversing - if you think it's sowing discord then fuck off yourself. Fuck you for suggesting me to use "google" for anything as well. Web searching, not a problem but I am looking for if anybody else has noticed if anything has come after blue-shills pushing their agenda. Things like subtly changing articles in order to slowly rewrite history.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, when big tech and corporate america took it over. It's been shit ever since.

[–] • 0 pt

I think where you are going is why did we give the internet to the unwashed masses? It was a STUPID idea.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not quite there yet...

I'm still around the "What content is intentional BS (government propaganda, or lies), incompetent BS (fictions or lies described as misinformation), or legitimate information."

Mainstream news is hit or miss and I try to be careful of what I reference because the people I speak to tend to "believe" Mainstream media and I try to articulate the problems in the mainstream reporting. Generally that's why I like legitimate sources rather than some article referencing another article creating a circle of articles all referencing each other like a massive journalist circle-jerk creating fictional truths by sheer mass of reporting rather than legitimate facts.

[–] • 0 pt

the real internet died with cliff yablonski