WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Who chooses what "are" those things? Congrats, they're now your rulers.

Be careful what you wish for.

[–] 1 pt

Correct. The second you try to ban anything, you tyrannize. That's not the way white society works. Instead, people simply reject evil because they understand. Don't ban faggots from attempting to have queer story time, parents simply reject it and don't bring their children.

Right now, colleges and universities ban certain words to affect people's behavior. That's tyranny. Ironic since places of education are supposed to teach about ideas, not stifling ideas.

You ban ideas and things in societies that can't imagine consequences.

[–] 2 pts

This is a very interesting consideration. I agree banning is tyranny. However, if you don’t ban things, the evils (trannys, jews, et cetera) will just continue to wheedle and drill and jew their way in to your society. They won’t stop. Ever. And they will try every little thing. You have to draw a line and the line has to be visible. Just not participating in their shenanigans isn’t enough because they won’t stop. We should shoot them.

[–] 0 pt

The root problem is fiat currency, which allows criminals to steal our wealth, which allows them to subvert us with agendas like trannies, multiple genders and so on. Realize these people are mentally ill and normally would simply be a nuisance. However, throw money at them and fund their subversion, then it's a weapon. Same with illegal immigration. Their transportation is subsidized by our unending tax dollars. NGOs make money by subverting our sovereignty by importing illegals. I could go on, but you probably already see my point.

[–] 0 pt

You don't capitalize White and you suggest stopping tyrannical jews and libtard leftists is tyranny. Hmm...