While you make numerous valid points, where you lose me is this:
I'm still not seeing a down side.
You're looking to the government to be the solution for a problem caused by the government.
That's a fair counter point. But at the end of the day, some form of governance and management thereof is going to exist? The question becomes, doesn't this implicitly limit the power of government corrupt and significantly increase the exposure surface and complexity for creation corruption like we see today? Whites are not immune to corruption.
But at the end of the day, some form of governance and management thereof is going to exist? The question becomes, doesn't this implicitly limit the power of government corrupt and significantly increase the exposure surface and complexity for creation corruption like we see today? Whites are not immune to corruption.
I totally see where you're coming from with this and it's an admirable goal. And I agree that whites aren't immune to corruption. That's why I prefer to limit any powers granted to a governmental body to the minimum required.
(post is archived)