Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

638

I found some shocking evidence that having explosive devices propel a canvas sack into your face at 200 mph may not be safe.

https://news.uga.edu/more-harm-than-good/ https://phys.org/news/2005-06-airbags-probability-death-accidents.amp https://www.stat.colostate.edu/~meyer/airbags.htm

I found some shocking evidence that having explosive devices propel a canvas sack into your face at 200 mph may not be safe. https://news.uga.edu/more-harm-than-good/ https://phys.org/news/2005-06-airbags-probability-death-accidents.amp https://www.stat.colostate.edu/~meyer/airbags.htm

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (26).
[–] • 0 pt

Roll a truck doing 80

Have but it was a car and we endowed... Worst case senario isn't the defacto because it happened to you one time.

[–] • 0 pt

I stand by my original assertion that you are retarded for thinking seatbelts are not necessary.

Have but it was a car and we endowed.

Then

Worst case senario isn't the defacto because it happened to you one time.

The point you made against mine directly conflicts with your own assertion.

I've totaled 7 vehicles. So no, not just 1 data point like you. I've rolled, rearended, been rearended, been t boned and hydroplaned. I've walked from them all. Do you but inertia is a bitch.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I've totaled 7 vehicles

You're a shit driver. End of story.

The point you made against mine directly conflicts with your own assertion.

You don't english well do you? You cry seatbelt cause you crash all the time. That does not mean seatbelts are necessary or "change the statistics" like i said. I did not contradict myself. You're just an idiot.

[–] • 0 pt

You're a shit driver. End of story.

In other news, water is wet. You're quite observant.