Well, you see, it's in how you do it. If you take the x2+m and let it equal 12 when the upper limit is 18, then you can instantly generate x+1 energy from a given input of y. When the sun isn't in the position indicated on the standard output charts, the solar minimums do dip, but that's unavoidable. Simply position your sun at solar maximum and you'll be fine.
Well, you see, it's in how you do it. If you take the x2+m and let it equal 12 when the upper limit is 18, then you can instantly generate x+1 energy from a given input of y. When the sun isn't in the position indicated on the standard output charts, the solar minimums do dip, but that's unavoidable. Simply position your sun at solar maximum and you'll be fine.
That sounded just like a khazarian astrophysicist wrote it. Maybe it's just that new, not as rayciss math. I don't get it.
That sounded just like a khazarian astrophysicist wrote it. Maybe it's just that new, not as rayciss math. I don't get it.
It's so new and untested that even I don't understand it.
It's so new and untested that even I don't understand it.
(post is archived)