WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

277

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Spouses cannot be forced to testify against one another.

[–] 3 pts

A lot of states recognize what's known as common law marriage where cohabitation of a couple over time makes them married in the eyes of some courts.

[–] 2 pts

My state is 7 years together under the same roof you're common law.

[–] 2 pts

That's silly! You can't enter into a contract by just existing

[–] 3 pts

> That's silly! You can't enter into a contract by just existing

Isn't the sovereignty/social security number scam just that. It's your slave id number for a contract you never signed. You simply exist.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

The only state I know that is true is Ontario (most infamously Stephen v. Stawecki). I haven't found precedent in any US state.

[–] 2 pts

Right now - it's used as a weapon against Aryan men.

It also heavily depends on what kind of woman you choose.

[–] 2 pts

This is a great argument to present normies when they support gay marriage. If you can't in principle have children, what's the point?

[–] 1 pt

If you're a man, you go from having zero parental rights to...some.

[–] 1 pt

I've always felt this. Id have a marriage ceremony, but no legality involved

[–] 1 pt

A marriage license ensures the front hole can leach off you for years if she decides to end it, and the State will enforce the extortion

I think there is something with taxes but it doesn't seem like it's worth it.

[–] 0 pt

It's like the devil's money - gov't giving you back what was already yours but taken by force, as long as you stay in the three-party contract called state marriage.

[–] 1 pt

Shows the world, society, that the both of you are taken.

Used to be, you had to nail the announcement on the town center or courthouse door.

But nowadays, it's a joke.