The problem with paganism is there is only neo-paganism. There is so little recorded history on it that virtually no details of the practice of it survive. You have the myths, which are cool and fine to study as a way of attempting to understand Indo-European societies and try to make some assumptions about the default mode of life. But every detail of neo-pagan religious practice is being made up whole cloth (usually by white people who are very obviously sub-100 IQ). Then there is the somewhat disturbing trend of homosexuality, even in folkish paganism (paganism with racism). I don't have a source for this. All anecdotal. But the fact that you see gay pagans at all tells you this identity seems to attract a certain type. And lastly you have the problem of the ancestors themselves. Neo-pagans will claim the ancestors were force-converted to Christianity and anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. They need to say this because if the ancestors were not force-converted, then Christianity, too, is the religion of your European ancestors. Archaeologists who study that time period usually think pagans converted to Christianity willingly. I'm not an archaeologist, but neither are these sub-100 IQ pagans. But even without knowing for sure, the idea that you could change the religion of all European society under the threat of violence is an idea I find really doubtful. Moreover, even though Christianity is inclusive (a person of any race can convert), the values it promotes seems to reflect what white people are into (for the time being, that's a lot of cuckery which is unfortunate). Jews hate it a lot more than they hate paganism. And even though the majority of both Christians and pagans are faggotized idiots, the Christians that are racist are generally of a lot higher quality than the pagans who are racist. FYI I'm more or less a fedora tipper, but I was at one point very interested in the Nordic mythology and I still think it's cool.