I’m pretty sure their contracts have all been updated with new clauses to prevent that.
Employment clauses can trump one's constitutional rights? That's top shelf (((jewry))).
They’d say “No one forced you to sign it”
You know (((judges))) will side with (((them))).
That's where the battle lies. One may have to take the case all the way to the SCOTUS to eventually win.
I looked at this post as one way to take the offensive, taking the fight to (((them))) using the Rule of Law and Consitution as weapons to bleed them to death through "1000 cuts" (with others doing the same from other angles).
I was brainstorming different ways to fight back. We have the Constitution, we know (((their plan))), we know they must exceed their legal or Constitutional authority with (((their plan))), you know the subjugstion is coming. We have receipts wrt Covid proving masks, vaccinations, isolation, distancing, shutting down business and schools is detrimental to health and livlihood. We also have proof of cures, suppression of truth, etc. It would seem we have everything we need to take many angles of attack. The big obstacle is the judicial system. Individually only those who can afford the (((legal))) fight and win can consider joining in that battlefield. Other options include class action lawsuits to engage those who can't afford to bring the battle to (((their))) doorstep. Other options?
This could be an interesting discussion on POAL. Get some lawfags to weigh in. We could brainstorm ideas of how individuals can take positions on the offense before and during the rollout of (((their plan))).. We have discovered the boycott works. We have cut cords, tuned out MSM, Cancelled all things Disney, dumped Bud Light, etc. They are feeling it. We The People have forgotten our powers, it's time to seriously inventory them and look at how we can most effectively exercise them, individually and collectively. I don't feel that We The People know the full scope of our opportunity to get ahead of (((their plan))) and beat (((them))) with it.
No, you are still acting and thinking you're not a minority in a totally corrupt and captured Nation. Using the 'legal system' will not suffice anymore - it's gone way past that. Have an actual look at history how all other groups have had to use political and social violence to finally become today's 'legally recognized and protected classes'. You're 50 years too late proposing lets use the Rule of Law and Constitution. The crooks are in charge of everything!!.
No, you are still acting and thinking you're not a minority.
I'm not a minority here and my politics are in the majority.
Using the 'legal system' will not suffice anymore - it's gone way past that.
Agreed, but only to varying degrees. Lower courts seem infiltrated, higher courts less so. At this time. Most of the lawfare we've seen to date was directed at political opposition or protection of (((DS))) assets (Biden, Clinton, Obummer, FBI, etc.).
Have an actual look at history how all other groups have had to use political and social violence to finally become today's 'legally recognized and protected classes'.
They didn't have a US Constitution, separation of powers, states rights, individual rights. This isn't about becoming today's 'legally recognized and protected class'. This is becoming a modern day revolution against an oppressive government as described by the Constitution.
(post is archived)