Christianity/Paganism/Atheism (another group trying to assert a role) as the path for Aryans should never be a hard dividing line among ourselves at this time. It can be debated as to what is best, but any of them can be suited to ethnic/race/aryan loyalties. We can divide once the jews are gone. For now, we hang together or hang separately.
While white women must bear responsibility for their sins against their race, they are still victims of a jew deception. Eve was deceived by the snake, but she still received a curse; it wasn’t excused. However, white men must go forward and assert a proper order for them, and those who fail to fall in line after that must be shunned or even ultimately executed depending on how egregious their betrayal to the aryan race.
The easy assumption is that all in politics are capable of being compromised, even if they stand tall for a while. We are all human flesh. Observe closely, and never trust one who requires aprobation to govern. This is why monarchies are superior to elected government. The monarch must bear full weight for his failure to defend his people and his land.
”monarchies are superior to elected government”
I’m sure 100% of monarchs agree with you, LOL.
Monarchies are the worst of all the possible forms of tyranny.
The fact that this even needs to be explained is batshit insane.
A representative republic is truly the best form of earthly government in my opinion and per the historical record.
All forms of government have weaknesses, granted.
Our form of government works so long as the constitution is followed.
At some point, it was usurped. And RIGHT NOW, we live in a benign oligarchy.
But even an oligarchy is better than a monarchy because there is still a division of power. All the power in the hands of one dude or one family is the most terrifying thing currently on the planet.
Sure it’s great if the monarch is a decent human. But that’s never guaranteed and even if you’re lucky enough to have such a king for your generation, it only ever lasts so long. At some point, you’ll get a Nero and then wish to God for literally any other type of government.
No. Our constitution is fine. It’s that it’s not being followed that is the problem…and the one group of people truly able to set things right (federal law enforcement and military) are corrupted, inept, incompetent, asleep, or some combination thereof.
Read Democracy: The God That Failed and get back to me, Schlomo.
Representative government is a quagmire and will always exceed its mandate while hiding behind “the will of the people.” Constitutions, compacts, and cartas might delay the inevitable, but only briefly.
A monarch alone won’t stand for long. He requires a religious bureaucracy to retain his power. Whether Confucianism, Catholicism, Teotl, Democracy or any other mystical force to which he can lay blame for his circumstances and from whom he can claim “higher authority,” it must exist or he will be held to account by an angry mob, usually paid in his own blood.
Strip away his religious protection, and he is a man on his own with limited resources. The only difference between a US President and a monarch is a that those subject to the monarch can’t be held responsible for “choosing” him, and therefore have a greater likelihood to resent and eventually commit regicide.
Your criticisms of representative government are noted, and like I said before, that form of government has its own list of cons.
But then all forms of government do.
It should also be noted that the founding fathers were well aware of the potential cracks in the wall. Those cracks couldn’t be mitigated by the government itself, however. Only by the people, and they made this plainly known time and again. A couple of examples which come to mind:
“Such a form of government is only fitting for a moral society. It is wholly inadequate for any other.” So is that on the government or the people? Or some combination of both?
And then the one about: “it’ll work until the people realize that they can vote themselves favors from the treasury.”
Moving on…
The idea that “poorly performing monarchs get ousted when they fuck up too big” is a load of absolute horseshit. I don’t need to read your little book to know it because I know history, and history does not back up that ridiculous assertion. If anything, history proves it to be 100% false.
The basic principle that power divided amongst many provides more safeguard than absolute power in the hands of a single dude is not only proven through history, it’s just plain fucking logical.
I will concede one thing to your argument, though. Which is, a monarchy is the best form of government if Jesus is the monarch.
But until that day comes, no thanks.
Also, I would like you to tell me which of the monarchies currently on the planet is so great. The British one? The Saudi one? Pray tell, which one? And why don’t you live there if it’s so wonderful?
(post is archived)