Two papers and two medical universities were unable to locate c19 in the wild from any bodies which were "confirmed" to have died from c19. The FDA/CDC, in development of the PCR tests, documented they did not have a c19 sample available and as such used an analog of influenza and corona.
All available information says it never existed in the first place. To date, the only people who ever "studied" it have done so in labs where c19 was provided to them. AFAIK, it has never been detected or observed in the wild.
That's the original strain. Variants have been collected and sequenced from infected people thousands and thousands of times by more labs than you can count. That's how they are able to make the evolutionary charts of the virus showing thousands of variants and perform genomic surveillance.
https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global/6m
https://asm.org/Articles/2020/October/SARS-CoV-2-Sequencing-Data-The-Devil-Is-in-the-Gen
Please show me where we can confirm they obtained and processed samples found in the wild. To date, everything I've found does not support this claim and appears to be more slight of hand magic with substitutions coming from labs (directly or indirectly) and not samples captured from the wild.
Mutation is common in labs and there are many papers confirming they did mutate it in the lab.
No, I'm not wasting my time with you. I've seen your interactions with stabem.
(post is archived)