yeah, there is something strange about the production and promotion of this movie.
I'm all for exposing pedos and the elite child trafficking rings, but something is seriously sketchy about this movie.
Maybe, or maybe we're just so Jaded by all of this that we assume the worst.
I think there is a bit of both. But, there are certain things we know. For example, if ((( they ))) don't want information out in the open, it won't be. They can scrub social media effectively enough. And yet, we are supposed to believe that someone is able to produce a movie (using $13+ million) in the mainstream and get mainstream theaters to play it, and the elites aren't able to stop it? I don't buy that for a second.
Now I'm seeing narratives about how the main actor guy (not producers, nor directors) is being "targetted by the CIA they are trying to kill him". But we KNOW that is bullshit. Why? Because if the CIA wanted someone gone, then they are gone. Gag order served to family and any others who may speak out.
We have to suspend disbelief in order to accept the narrative about this movie. There is something fishy going on.
Edit: Something else to note: every person that goes to see this movie in theaters will be put on a "knows too much" watchlist. Only people paying in cash could potentially avoid this. but, we all know most people pay with card these days.
Edit: Something else to note: every person that goes to see this movie in theaters will be put on a "knows too much" watchlist. Only people paying in cash could potentially avoid this. but, we all know most people pay with card these days.
You and everyone else here are already on "lists." OPSEC is important online, but that is to keep you safe from cyber jews. The NSA, CIA, FBI, DOD, etc. all have and can aquire your data at any time they wish. Going to see a movie isn't going to change that.
I agree. I applaud the efforts of Tim Ballard and Jim Caviezel. But Caviezel still parrots the 6 Million Lie, and he believes adrenochrome is harvested from every single drop of aborted baby blood, etc. My understanding is that adrenochrome isn't even in the blood until a person is tortured first to produce it.
And you think being ripped limb from limb while still alive doesn’t qualify as torture?
Perhaps that term applies after developing to the point where there are limbs. The vast majority of abortions occur well before that. It would also have to be after adrenal glands have formed
Adrenochrome is a natural metabolite of adrenaline. You always have some in your body, especially right after a fight-or-flight response. If you don't think an aborted fetus is having a FOF response, you haven't seen an ultrasound of an abortion.
You still need developed adrenal glands to produce adrenochrome.
It's being promoted through the church networks (Roman and protestant). That's probably why it feels different.
(post is archived)