I am skeptical of it. I bet if you looked into the producers/funding you'd find some sketchy shit.
Without looking much into it, the problem I have with the movie is that everyone "on the right" knows about it at the same time. I heard about it from normies, and now I see it everywhere.
I was kind of surprised to see that all the local theaters in my area are carrying it I thought it was more of a small production that would be hard to find.
yeah, there is something strange about the production and promotion of this movie.
I'm all for exposing pedos and the elite child trafficking rings, but something is seriously sketchy about this movie.
Maybe, or maybe we're just so Jaded by all of this that we assume the worst.
I agree. I applaud the efforts of Tim Ballard and Jim Caviezel. But Caviezel still parrots the 6 Million Lie, and he believes adrenochrome is harvested from every single drop of aborted baby blood, etc. My understanding is that adrenochrome isn't even in the blood until a person is tortured first to produce it.
It's being promoted through the church networks (Roman and protestant). That's probably why it feels different.
I don’t think so man. Angel studios is who did the film (the same outfit who did the Chosen series which was wonderful), Caviezel is solid, Tim Ballard is solid. Don’t get so jaded that you see a devil literally everywhere.
Read the new testament. Discernment is all about seeing the devils within the flock.
I do not put my faith in man.
I am quite familiar with the new the new testament and the concept of discernment, thank you. Angel studios is doing God’s work, so far as I can tell. Jim Caviezel is doing God’s work, so far as I can tell.
In any case, I’m interested in knowing exactly what you find so problematic here. Thus far, you’ve just made some ambiguous detractions.
Guy makes the definitive movie about Jesus and does it more justice than anyone before him. Pays a hefty professional price for it, doesn’t care. Then makes a film exposing international child trafficking, same thing. And then you take issue with him, but can’t even explain why except to levy some baseless and ambiguous complaints.
I’m all for hearing what your problems are with these people, but then I’m not sure that you even know what your problems are.
Until then, all I see is a few people doing some world-changing good, and then you criticizing them for it. It makes zero sense.
I’m all for exercising discernment, and I think we should definitely be on the lookout and then call out the wolves posing as sheep. But if you take it so far that you can’t even discern a good guy when you see him, how does that help, either?
You mentioned their “funding mechanisms”. So, out with it.. what did they do that was so shady? From what I know it was crowd funded. Are you implying that child traffickers funded the film? If not, then what are you implying? Enough with the veiled criticism. State your case already.
You can’t just accuse people of being wolves and and then not back it up at all.
As of right now, you’re literally no better than the sickos in the media who are criticizing the film and its creators so far as I can tell.
(post is archived)