Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

448

So many people have latched on to that brief soundbite from Assange and used it as a basis for conspiracies yet I have never located any more details from Assange himself on the topic. Sure plenty of other people have written stuff about it or made videos detailing it, but unless it comes from Julian Assange, all of that is just the equivalent of "cyber fear porn fan fiction". I don't think anyone used the term "smart dust" before Assange did so that was not already an established concept until he said it in that interview. Surely if it were such an important topic that Assange felt needed to be mentioned, I would think he would have talked about it more or at least elaborated on it in the interview. Once he said it in the interview, he just kept on going down the road without circling back or anything. It always seemed weird that people ran with it hard when there was nothing really said about it outside of a catchy phrase. What's up with that?

So does anyone have more detail from Assange himself on "smart dust"? I don't want any other source since Assange was the one who kicked it all off and everyone else will simply be spinning yarns from the concept. I want Julian's words and his words only. Got anything else from him?

So many people have latched on to that brief soundbite from Assange and used it as a basis for conspiracies yet I have never located any more details from Assange himself on the topic. Sure plenty of other people have written stuff about it or made videos detailing it, but unless it comes from Julian Assange, all of that is just the equivalent of "cyber fear porn fan fiction". I don't think anyone used the term "smart dust" before Assange did so that was not already an established concept until he said it in that interview. Surely if it were such an important topic that Assange felt needed to be mentioned, I would think he would have talked about it more or at least elaborated on it in the interview. Once he said it in the interview, he just kept on going down the road without circling back or anything. It always seemed weird that people ran with it hard when there was nothing really said about it outside of a catchy phrase. What's up with that? So does anyone have more detail from Assange himself on "smart dust"? I don't want any other source since Assange was the one who kicked it all off and everyone else will simply be spinning yarns from the concept. I want Julian's words and his words only. Got anything else from him?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Epstein was on the board of lifeboat, as were/are very well known scientists. They discuss smart dust and homes that will seal the stuff out by a sort of nanotech defenses. Julian is not a scientist, so he just discussed the work of those in the nanotech industry. Remember the Harvard scientist Lieber arrested for China/tech/smuggling info to the commies? He works with nanotech/self-assembling microscopic bots/systems. I suggest some links to read. https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2001/11/liquid-computing.html https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2011/01/virus-sized-transistors https://www.theneweconomy.com/technology/microscopic-smart-dust-sensors-are-set-to-revolutionise-a-range-of-sectors https://lifeboat.com/blog/2017/01/smart-dust-the-future-of-involuntary-treatment-of-the-public https://lifeboat.com/blog/2019/07/smart-dust-and-nano-bots https://nextbridge.com/smart-dust-and-future-of-nanotechnology/ https://bernardmarr.com/smart-dust-is-coming-are-you-ready/

My question is, why are you acting dismissive of the darpa-driven discoveries?

[–] • 1 pt

My question is, why are you acting dismissive of the darpa-driven discoveries?

You suggest I'm being dismissive of "DARPA-drive discoveries", but no one has any proof that such things actually exist. If this technology were being used pervasively, then someone would have discovered it by now. There are many professional and amateur scientists with access to equipment quite capable of finding this so called "intelligent dust". Surely by now these nano-structures would have been detected and at least rudimentarily analyzed, but there's nothing anyone can show concretely. Sure there are plenty of videos of sketchy discoveries made by ordinary people such as all the supposed nano-structures found in the (((vaxx))) or tap water or what-have-you, but those are always too hokey to be believed. I've never seen any of those videos that didn't include compulsive commentary that is intended to turn off the viewer's critical thinking so that the narrative message could be delivered cleanly. They just reek of manipulation and agenda-driven fear porn.

People who believe this stuff outright have an incentive to believe it and spread it around. They are either addicted to the brain chemicals produced from fear or they are working as propagandists/mouth pieces for those who wish to keep us in fear. I've never seen one of these people be truly skeptical and questioning rather than simply stating what they found is absolutely real and you should believe it outright. I'm looking for real truth not speculation, conjecture, false fear and manipulated information. I want some real intelligent research and analysis by people who don't speak like half-wits or draw conclusions that are not demonstrable. I want truth. I don't want fear porn. I am a skeptic and a critical thinker. I have done plenty of my own looking around using capable equipment and other experimental means and nothing has materialized for me, including the "mask worms" and "hydras" and other fear porn from the jewflu era. Funny how that all disappeared, right?

So no, I'm not being dismissive. I'm being skeptical and inquisitive while simultaneously asking for intellectual honesty and truth in the matter. Julian Assange isn't a scientist, but neither are all the people who will simply believe that DARPA or anyone else has such capabilities. It's far too easy for lies to be conjured out of thin air and spread around by useful idiots so that the common person believes the lies. Don't you think the (((government))) has an incentive to want us skeptical people to believe "intelligent dust" is real so that we self-police our communications, actions and interactions? They don't need actual nano-spy machines to keep us in line if they can convince us that they are already everywhere and we can't escape them. It seems that too many people will just take things at face value rather than seek the truth. They made us change our behavior with only the concept of such technology. Doesn't that seem more like a psyop than actual technology?