WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

929

A simple yes or no will do. Or explain your position if you feel like it. I'm curious to see what people think.

A simple yes or no will do. Or explain your position if you feel like it. I'm curious to see what people think.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

It's not waste. Calling it waste is simply dishonest.

[–] 0 pt

It is waste. And that is how it is classified. You will find nothing that says different. Facts

[–] 0 pt

Oy vey goy, ignore what it physically is and only trust what us Jews say.

It's 97%-98% unspent fuel.

[–] 0 pt

It's 97%-98% unspent fuel.

It's already been used. It is used and then put in pools to cool and then most often stored in stainless steel containers and buried underground. Hanford, Washington is not some made up location. You can call it what you want but the fact is you or I don't control what they do and don't call waste and or if and when it is considered spent. The still store it with no real long term plan and they are considering dumping it into the oceans.

Oy vey goy, ignore what it physically is and only trust what us Jews say.

lol nice low level insult. Uh oh, you capitalized jew...

Oy vey goy, the jews don't give a fuck what you think it physically is. Oy vey goy, the jews tell you it's safe and effective to dump nuclear waste in the ocean.