WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

414

A simple yes or no will do. Or explain your position if you feel like it. I'm curious to see what people think.

A simple yes or no will do. Or explain your position if you feel like it. I'm curious to see what people think.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

You're mixing many things. This is radioactive water. It can be done safely.

97%-98% of all radioactive "waste" is actually nuclear fuel.

We don't have a nuclear waste problem. Nor don't we have a gun problem. Those concepts only exist because of propaganda.

[–] 0 pt

97%-98% of all radioactive "waste" is actually nuclear fuel

Spent nuclear fuel is called "high level" toxic waste and is the worst kind. Thank you for proving my pojnt further. There is >90,000 metric tons of highly radioactive waste in the US alone. >200 million liters of radioactive waste in underground storage tanks in Hanford, Washington alone.

This is radiative water. It can be done safely.

Can it? There is zero evidence to suggest that. Zero studies conclude it is safe to put radio active waste in the oceans. Find one that definitively states that putting nuclear waste in the ocean is safe.

[–] 1 pt

It's not waste. Calling it waste is simply dishonest.

[–] 0 pt

It is waste. And that is how it is classified. You will find nothing that says different. Facts