' Does it again sometime later, spawning a few copy cats to do the same. '
And still no-one died - not even from the multiple copy cats. Thats my point. It negates the reason for a Darwin award. Darwin has the implied distinction of causing an individuals death in such an obviously retarded and overtly negligent yet preventable way that even a downs syndrome would baulk at following. These are 'irresponsible fools that lived to tell the story', an polar opposite of a true 'darwin award'.
Oh I agree but here is the link
https://darwinawards.com/stupid/stupid1998-11.html
I'm sure you can find their contact us button and complain about it to them. Maybe they'll even remove the honorable mention award for you if it bothers you so much.
For what it's worth, this "copy cat" did die when the winds blew him far into the oceanside and he didn't know how to use his GPS when he called for help on his satellite phone. Nobody found him - only the balloons.
Oh i see. Sure whatever - but Darwin is taking oneself out of the gene pool - it's all good.
Everyone seems to forget that the Darwin Award does not require death; merely removing yourself from the gene pool. This means self-sterilization is sufficient. It also means defacto disqualification for anyone who has already procreated.
In any case, balloon man was never in the running.
You guys are taking this just a bit too seriously.
Meh, these are the established criteria for a Darwin Award; it's not that complicated.
(post is archived)