Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

830

I'm having trouble finding the study that compared average black brains to average White brains. It concluded that the average black had about 30% less frontal lobe mass, which goes a long way toward explaining nigger behavior. I'd like to have this study to show to a few people- I've got them on the brink of being red pilled on race, this might be the cincher.

I recall seeing a nigger skull compared to a White skull, and the image highlighted the massive size difference in the frontal lobe between some bald negress and a White woman. That photo would be a good start.

Thanks in advance.

I'm having trouble finding the study that compared average black brains to average White brains. It concluded that the average black had about 30% less frontal lobe mass, which goes a long way toward explaining nigger behavior. I'd like to have this study to show to a few people- I've got them on the brink of being red pilled on race, this might be the cincher. I recall seeing a nigger skull compared to a White skull, and the image highlighted the massive size difference in the frontal lobe between some bald negress and a White woman. That photo would be a good start. Thanks in advance.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (19).
[–] • 1 pt

on average, gorillas have bigger brains than Nigerians who have bigger brains than Europeans. and while most average people have similar brain structure, where certain processes are handled in certain areas (i.e. Broca's area), there are many subpopulations and individuals within any large population where those functional areas are not the same. This is particularly true with people who are smart, talented, suffered an early head injury, left handed, feral, etc
So basically the frontal lobe is for forethought, if you arent particularly unique or intelligent. And a large one could mean a lot of things, but just like a big computer, it doesnt necessarily mean its more fast, powerful, efficient, etc, but maybe slow and outdated.

[–] • 3 pts

What you are doing is comparing apples to oranges. I'm not sure if it is your intent because you are a shill, or you have just been brainwashed by the jew corrupted education system. So I will give you the benefit of the doubt and explain the flaws in your analysis and conclusions.

Different species will have vastly different brain structrue, function and development. You rightfully point out that comparisons between their size can not determine intelligence. But then you extrapolate that to same species comparisons and that is wrong. The latter is an apples to apples comparison, it is nothing like comparing the brains of different species.

We can scientifically prove that controlling for body size and age, there is a strong correlation between size and function of human brains. We have lots of evidence that shows growth in the regions of the brain that are used more, and larger sizes in people who are more intelligent.

Brain size between humans can reliably be used to determine intelligence. Any claim otherwise is purely a lie.

The studies that showed african brains are smaller did not use the "outdated" skulls of ancient africans, but modern day africans compared to same age, sex and sized non africans. Those results are as conclusive and riggorous as science gets.

[–] • 0 pt

actually in humans, brain size is not correlated with intelligence. This is psyc 101, so I'd bet you havent ever run a peer reviewed psychology study.

[–] • 0 pt

Bullshit. There were many studies that proved it was before science got kiked.