It's not used much because it's a stupid risky way to buy property - you're relying on the original mortgagee to continue with the mortgage in good faith because they still own it. The original mortgagee is also relying on the new buyer to act in good faith and make payments, but if they don't then the original winds up holding the bag.
If the original decides to sell to someone else, declare bankruptcy, etc. then the subject-to buyer is out. If the subject-to buyer defaults, the original is out.
Plus the companies who pull this crap are absolute grade-A assholes, they essentially take over the ownership of the house before documents are ever approved, which im pretty sure is beyond illegal
It's probably in one of those legal gray areas where it's not really regulated per se but it could maybe fall under either this or that so it doesn't really fall anywhere that's concrete.
Pretty much, in this case some a-hole company put a memorandum on my house and is now demanding 50,000 to take it off ... piece of crap scammers is what they are
(post is archived)