Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

803

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

Nothing whatsoever is wrong with the Constitution. Globalism IGNORES it and does as they please in violation. It just needs to be enforced.

[–] • 2 pts

What mechanisms exist in the Constitution to guarantee it is enforced?

[–] • 6 pts

John Adams cited “a moral and religious people” as being necessary.

And that’s the very “mechanism” that seems to be in short supply these days.

[–] • 3 pts

It is supposed to be that we are armed. The problem is we allow it. The end.

[–] • 3 pts

Excellent question. I would say the clause about TREASON. We need a few hangings in the public square.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

States stipulating that only White land owners may vote, for starters.

[–] • 0 pt

This is how you solve all of the world's problems - enforcing personal boundaries up to and including physical violence if necessary.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

with periodical repairs, from generation to generation, to the end of time.

https://bearstatebooks.com/blog/2021/03/07/the-tytler-cycle-suggests-a-democracy-only-lasts-200-years/

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury.“

“The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.”

[–] • 3 pts

Makes sense with the good men bad times etc cycle

[–] • 4 pts

We had racial, linguistic, cultural and religious homogeneity at the conception of The Untied States Constitution, field hands and stone age savages notwithstanding. John Adams remarked, “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Morality and virtue and faith are the bedrock of our republic. Only men of property were afforded the responsibility of voting. Universal suffrage was anathema to the founders. Democracy was intentionally employed and inscribed with a little d. It was a tool, not a system.

[–] • 2 pts

Agreed. Would have been great to enshrine all that in the Constitution

[–] • 4 pts (edited )

The American experiment failed because people were unwilling to go to the lengths necessary to preserve the republic. I think it has a lot to do with the country being too big for a federalist style government. People are too far removed from the center of power, literally and figuratively. A confederacy (supremacy of the states) would have helped a lot.

[–] • 2 pts

I tend to agree there. Decentralization of power should have been our instinct and not the exception.

[–] • 4 pts

Jews infiltrated early on and have slowly eroded the constitution and twisted the law to their will ever since. The 2nd thing that ruined the constitution was allowing women and niggers to vote.

[–] • 3 pts

A piece of paper is useless without the tradition to back it. Hence why first we had the Christian tradition, and 300 years later, it was condensed in the Bible.

[–] • 3 pts

What about

if you can keep it

do you not understand?

[–] • 1 pt

Yes, I recall 'ol Ben Franklin supposedly uttered that. Doesn't help answer the question, however. In what ways did we not keep it?

[–] • 2 pts

Robber barons, tycoons, and globalism. At some point, those elites stop caring about their underlings; instead, they identify with other elites. It’s beyond nationalism, it’s us-over-them, which has no border or flag to show allegiance to.

They pushed policy to maintain their wealth, and it had nothing to do with helping their country.

Read Confessions of an Economic Hitman. It’s still happening, and it’s not just the jews

[–] • 0 pt

The question is phrased poorly and dishonest. It very aptly answers your "question."

[–] • 1 pt

What crawled up your ass?

[–] • 2 pts

A healthy chunk of the ammendments after the first 10 really fucked things up.

[–] • 0 pt

I subscribe to the belief that even the first 10 were a mistake. It flips everything important totally backwards. The GOVERNMENT was intended to have ONLY the rights specifically given to it by the constitution.

The entire "Bill of Rights" concept being enshrined as the first 10 Amendments literally does the opposite. It creates a situation where the government can now do anything it pleases, so long as it doesn't violate those 10 fundamental rights. In reality your rights don't come from government, and you have a lot more than 10.

It is the government that should have limited powers and limited rights, and the limits should be specifically imposed by the constitution. I understand why people would want a "bill of rights" but it fundamentally accomplished the opposite of it's stated intent, and it actually subverts your rights.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

The constitution is as foolproof as possible. Key phrase being “as possible”.

The founders also knew that the system of government they built could be undermined, as evidenced by their own words after having created it.

Three quotes that come to mind which support this are:

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” - Jefferson

Jefferson had no reason to make such a statement if he believed that the constitution or the system it represents are, in of themselves, 100% foolproof.

Another was when a woman asked Ben Franklin “What kind of government have you given us?” shortly after the constitution was finished. He replied, “A republic, madam, if you can keep it.”

If you can keep it. The constitution in of itself is just a piece of paper with ideas written on it. Those ideas must be held tightly and guarded if that piece of paper is to have any weight.

And then finally, John Adams said “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

This one is fairly is self-explanatory. The further this nation has turned from God, the worse things have become. It is not a coincidence and he wasn’t wrong.

They did the best they could, but they knew the potential pitfalls even back then. You have to admit, they weren’t wrong. Those men knew human nature as well as anyone who ever lived.

In any case, the constitution isn’t the problem. It’s the people, the culture.

We bitch about politics..and rightly so. But as someone said “politics is downstream of culture.” The root of the problem isn’t politics, it’s the culture driving it. And the root of the sick culture is sick people. And the root of sick people is turning away from God.

The evidence is overwhelming. One just has to pay the slightest bit of attention to understand that only an extremely sick culture would elect the type of miscreants that currently occupy positions of power.

That’s not to discount voter fraud or anything like that, either. But realize, for voter fraud to get to the point where it’s so brazen and ubiquitous as it currently is, required steps to get to that point. And those steps were increasingly shitty and degenerate elected officials chosen by an increasingly shitty and degenerate people.

[–] • 1 pt

Allowing lobbying, as a form of free speech wasn't a good idea

Load more (3 replies)