Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

However rare, I am confident they exist. All search algorithms or AI deflect or ignore.

However rare, I am confident they exist. All search algorithms or AI deflect or ignore.

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts (edited )

George Floyd. But his shots were him overdosing on fentanyl, having a heart attack, getting caught counterfeiting and crying for momma while being legally arrested.

libtard race card pulled

It ruined an innocent White man's life... and it also made a family of scumbag niggers millionaires because of a leftist judges social justice warriordom.

[–] • 4 pts

They do. Multiple people over the last decade have been acquitted for shooting a zog in no-knock raids. I'm unaware of any other circumstance though.

[–] • 2 pts

There's this. https://archive.ph/0ckHt

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

A new law likely makes Indiana the only state where people are allowed to shoot cops under certain circumstances. The change, police officials say, not only puts officer’s safety at risk but the public’s too.

"Wahhh, we need to be immune from citizens defending themselves from us even if we're in the wrong."

It's 2 a.m. and you wake up to the sight and sound of a police officer, but you didn't call the police. Are you allowed to shoot him or her for unlawfully entering your home? If you live in Indiana, maybe. ... The new law places the burden to decide what's legal on the people -- a task that most citizens (who lack law enforcement or legal training) aren't capable of, according to police officials.

Citizens are fully capable of recognizing that there's an unannounced intruder in their house and taking defensive action. How hard is this for those cops and journalists to understand? How about not entering people's houses unannounced in the middle of the night?

The law not only has the potential to put police officers' safety at risk, but also the public's. That's because, according to public safety officials, police in Indiana will now likely take extra caution when responding to emergencies -- and that means a delay in service. For example, if an injured person calls 911 seeking help but is unable to answer the door when the police arrive, instead of breaking in, officers may take extra time to contact their supervisor to try to get a hold of the person inside. "All the while the resident is injured and is not receiving help," said Richardson.

I'll take delayed response if it means they have to be respectful like normal law-abiding citizens.

he justices later clarified that the Fourth Amendment protections were still in place. Republican state Rep. Jud McMillin, one of the bill's co-sponsors, didn't think that was enough.

"I heard from a whole bunch of constituents who said 'Look, this is the United States of America. You're supposed to be able to protect yourself against anything that's happening to you that's unlawful."

Damn straight.

[–] • 1 pt

Legality only makes a difference to deplorables. Criminals have their own and distinct legal system. The laws we are subjected to don't apply. Therefore, the answer will be no.

[–] • 1 pt

tupac shot 2 cops and got off, they were in plain clothes and harassing him and others in a bar before proclaiming themselves cops, I don't know all the details but I'm sure it's all out there.

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 1 pt

Larken Rose has an article he wrote about this subject...

[–] • 1 pt

would love a link if you got one

[–] • 5 pts
[–] • 1 pt

gawd damn that was quick. Thx

[–] • 0 pt

I think there was a case in Missouri where a no knock raid at the wrong location resulted in the homeowner shooting cops he believed where home invaders

[–] • 0 pt

There's no such thing as illegally shooting a police officer.