WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

I mean i know it can do certain things, but all i see it doing is removing a layer of abstraction in the middle. Instead of me looking up something on wiki directly, i can jsut have the AI do it for me. To state this is some revolutionary system is a bit much. Also, i find it very (((interesting))) that AI is leading to more censorship calls from the kikes

I mean i know it can do certain things, but all i see it doing is removing a layer of abstraction in the middle. Instead of me looking up something on wiki directly, i can jsut have the AI do it for me. To state this is some revolutionary system is a bit much. Also, i find it very (((interesting))) that AI is leading to more censorship calls from the kikes

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts (edited )

Its not overblown. It is just beginning to he utilized. Its going to upturn the entire worlds economies. If they add powerful quantum computing capacity their main limitation, processing power, will be much reduced. AI is going to change the world entirely. Almost certainly for the worse. But theres no stopping it.

Its amuzing to see the comments here. Although aware of whats going on politically the people of this site are largely ludites and proud of it. AI is very real and its going to continue to get more and more powerful and competent. Long before it reaches anything we will call sentience its abilities will already have completely changed the worlds economies.

[–] 0 pt

the people of this site are largely ludites and proud of it.

Some people would call you a Luddite just for acknowledging that a new technology could make the world worse. These people are basically reverse Luddites, they revere technology for it's own sake and have forgotten it's purpose. Unfortunately that describes almost all programmers.

[–] 1 pt

AI is not going to be beneficial. All technology has good and bad uses. Even the good uses of AI will completely upturn the global ecomomies giving the elites exactly the push they want to implement their communist fully controlled world where AI will be used for the worst of its potentials. Not to mention the still real potential that AI does eventually go rogue and start doing things that no one likes. But thats a ways out yet. At the very very least a few years out.

[–] 3 pts

It seems overblown to you because it doesn't do anything particularly useful to your everyday life. If you needed to oppress, censor or deceive people on a daily basis you would realize how alarmingly fast it's progressing. This isn't inherent to AI but because the AI industry is all in with the bad guys.

[–] 2 pts

The damage is how real people think it is. Later, AI will be given rights. That will in turn allow the plutocrats to essentially end all freedom for the real population.

People are inherently lazy, AI enables people to become more lazy. That is the harm.

[–] 1 pt

' comment is pretty spot on. The danger is that AI is pushed as factually accurate and unbiased. Meaning the answers are directly derived from the unadulterated facts, therefore anything it says is true. This means the programmers have effectively created the wizard of oz to do their bidding. People will blindly follow.

On top of this, most the internet's comments are completely fake. They are generated by a combination of bots (scripted replies), $hills (people pushing an agenda [IDF, for example], paid or otherwise), useful idiots virtue signaling with no idea what it is they actually say, and AI, which crafts responses, tricks people engaging, and uses these for training to further censor all such discussions.

The ADL works very closely with every single Jew social media platform to use AI to heavily censor comments. The most heavily censored platform right now is YouTube. Notice you really talks abotu that. The ADL has repeatedly bragged of their use of AI to censor facts and information which are contrary to their judeo-satanic-agenda.

[–] 1 pt

what is touted as Ai is scripted replies

[–] 1 pt

AI isn't AI like you see in movies. It's a probabilistic language generator. Like, omg, that's so cray-cray is something it would write to imitate retarded women from SoCal. It has zero idea what the meaning of its writing is, just what structures are most common.

AI is also pervasively hamstrung to avoid hurting fee-fees, which makes it retarded because it isn't capable of coming to independent conclusions based upon reason and evidence.

AI, because it's probabilistic, also isnt capable of passing "common sense" logic puzzles that a child could figure out. E.g. if you feed it a data set including "the streets are wet after rain" it'll parrot that, but wont figure out the dozen other reasons the streets could be wet. Hobo piss, the fire department, melting snow, a crashed milk truck, a pressure washing crew cleaning them, etc will tilt it.

This is because computers are not intelligent. They're fast retards. Some people simply dont grasp the difference.

[–] 0 pt

Nonexistent, in terms of its actual abilities.

[–] 0 pt

The discussion here has been good, but everyone has blinders on, this technology is going to be everywhere, all the time and it's going to destroy jobs at all levels.

I've seen AI used to review images for "appropriateness", to detect and control traffic patterns, to recognize faces and follow any face through a large event.

We're seeing voice recognition & transcription moving into the drive-thru of fast food restaurants, doctors offices, insurance claims, and even legal firms. These are some of the next wave of jobs to be lost, just like those lost to self-checkout. AI is driving cars, moving goods in warehouses, operating switchboards, and working air traffic control 24x7 without a sick day or coffee break. The only people safe IMHO are home tradesmen, and that's due to the uniqueness of each encounter (plumbing, electrical, sewer to be specific).

The sad part is we all have the ability to resist, but won't. Refuse to use self checkout, refuse to speak to an automated order system, refuse to provide a phone number or email for a simple purchases.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Overrated from the perspective of autonomously solving problems and making important decisions that you can control. Useful for generating subjective generic content on demand.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Currently it's made out to be far more than it is. It's not conscious, it doesn't want to kill you (it can't want anything). It mimics people's writing so you think it's a capable, competent person when it's really just a confabulator. The danger is it being treated like it's more than it is and used inappropriately.

On the other hand, they can probably make much better versions that give genuinely useful functions to things. Even now they can be used to create novel pictures and stories, help with brainstorming, and write things for people who aren't scrutinizing them much. And to make endless useless tech help websites.

Just from a dystopian approach governments can use it to massively mimic people in forums and elsewhere. It's like the things automated license plate scanners allow, or tracking people's cellphones. It is auotmated and cheap so can be used for massive data mining/manipulation.

[–] 0 pt

its just software