If gender exists and sex is a social construct then where are all the Male / Female pair identical twins?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 0 pt

Just think about how bad the modern left and cuckservatives have fucked up the reality of race. Race is really a set of clearly different averages in populations. These averages apply not only to appearance but to personality as well. With appearance you can think about how many slanty-eyed negros or white people you've seen. The answer is probably none unless it's a mixed race creature. Generally, the left wants us to believe in the blank slate approach to people's traits and personalities. There is however a mountain of evidence suggesting that genetics are primarily (not absolutely) responsible for people's personalities and their abilities. Generally, the environmental influences are whether things are damaged or not and changing/improving things to be better than what genetics dictates is pretty much impossible. It is possible that you have a personality trait that is distinctly different from your racial average, but all the other ones will most likely be at or near average.

People are born male or female and with that generally comes a set of physical equipment that is distinctly different from the other. There are some screw ups, and a few rare cases of ambiguity, but it is so clear and obvious there is a pattern of physical distinction going on. The differences in girls and boys are not as pronounced as those in men and women. The obvious differences in the realm of personality and behavior are also a set of averages with some exceptions. Boys like playing with things like cars and action figures and girls tend to like dolls. Boys tend to be better at sports. Girls are more likely to include everyone whereas boys are more likely to be interested in who is useful and who is not.

With the onset of puberty the variation in personalities within each sex becomes more pronounced. We have an expected variation in testosterone levels in males, but the higher testosterone males are more responsible for what we perceive as masculine. If you're familiar with the original Saved By the Bell show, you have Slater, the muscular jock, Zack, the ordinary guy, and Screech, the skinny nerd. Each one of the characters and actors was a normal, straight male, but Slater had the most influence on what is masculine with a moderate amount coming from Zack. Do we see the skinny nerd, Screech, as being perfectly masculine and nothing wrong with him in that department? He should be bigger and stronger and tougher, right? Our general perception of gender is skewed and a little messed up. I'm sure larger-bodied women (even ones that aren't fat) and ones that aren't soft, emotional, and feminine get a lot of similar disregard. I honestly know less about it since I am not female, but there is also a skewed and unfair perception there as well.

Behind all of this sex/gender stuff you have the powerful chemicals known as testosterone, estrogen, and progesterone. Testosterone is produced by the testicles and the adrenal glands. In males about 10% is coming from the adrenal glands, and in females they don't have testicles producing that huge surplus of testosterone. Testosterone contributes to sex drive, muscle production, hair growth in various places, and even hair loss in those with an MPB X-chromosome. It tends to make personalities cold, unemotional, tough, and logical among other things. Estrogen and progesterone are all about being soft, emotional, and feminine and contribute to developing female physical characteristics such as breast development among other things. They tend to be better with people skills and language.

In recent times we have a lot of chemicals out there that are turning the frogs gay. They disrupt the proper development of male and female in the wombs of mothers, and then possible with on going exposure mess with people throughout their development and possibly even in their current states post-development. Of course if you're a libtard, you don't want to acknowledge this and don't even have a proper framework to admit that it is even a disruption in the first place. People are born how they are, and they are wonderful no matter what.

As a none-leftist/libtard, I acknowledge we have a perception of the genders of male and female. It is skewed and ambiguous. Whereas one type of idiot refuses to believe there are exceptions, another type of idiot refuses to believe there are averages and patterns.

As far as identical twins in this mess, I'm sure a leftist can find the one exception. Studies of identical twins raised in separate households found they are the most like each other, the second most like their biological parents, and the least like the people who raised them. I'm sure somewhere now there's one twin who ended up in the household of a libtard woman with her soy cuck, and the woman will most likely be looking for the slightest sign that a boy is a girl or a girl is a boy with no acknowledgement that children are often curious, exploratory, and ultimately, unrealistic idiots. I guess then we'll get to see how leftist parenting really screws a person up. I'm sure the twin raised in a normal household will feel like they dodged a bullet.

Just think about how bad the modern left and cuckservatives have fucked up the reality of race. Race is really a set of clearly different averages in populations. These averages apply not only to appearance but to personality as well. With appearance you can think about how many slanty-eyed negros or white people you've seen. The answer is probably none unless it's a mixed race creature. Generally, the left wants us to believe in the blank slate approach to people's traits and personalities. There is however a mountain of evidence suggesting that genetics are primarily (not absolutely) responsible for people's personalities and their abilities. Generally, the environmental influences are whether things are damaged or not and changing/improving things to be better than what genetics dictates is pretty much impossible. It is possible that you have a personality trait that is distinctly different from your racial average, but all the other ones will most likely be at or near average. People are born male or female and with that generally comes a set of physical equipment that is distinctly different from the other. There are some screw ups, and a few rare cases of ambiguity, but it is so clear and obvious there is a pattern of physical distinction going on. The differences in girls and boys are not as pronounced as those in men and women. The obvious differences in the realm of personality and behavior are also a set of averages with some exceptions. Boys like playing with things like cars and action figures and girls tend to like dolls. Boys tend to be better at sports. Girls are more likely to include everyone whereas boys are more likely to be interested in who is useful and who is not. With the onset of puberty the variation in personalities within each sex becomes more pronounced. We have an expected variation in testosterone levels in males, but the higher testosterone males are more responsible for what we perceive as masculine. If you're familiar with the original Saved By the Bell show, you have Slater, the muscular jock, Zack, the ordinary guy, and Screech, the skinny nerd. Each one of the characters and actors was a normal, straight male, but Slater had the most influence on what is masculine with a moderate amount coming from Zack. Do we see the skinny nerd, Screech, as being perfectly masculine and nothing wrong with him in that department? He should be bigger and stronger and tougher, right? Our general perception of gender is skewed and a little messed up. I'm sure larger-bodied women (even ones that aren't fat) and ones that aren't soft, emotional, and feminine get a lot of similar disregard. I honestly know less about it since I am not female, but there is also a skewed and unfair perception there as well. Behind all of this sex/gender stuff you have the powerful chemicals known as testosterone, estrogen, and progesterone. Testosterone is produced by the testicles and the adrenal glands. In males about 10% is coming from the adrenal glands, and in females they don't have testicles producing that huge surplus of testosterone. Testosterone contributes to sex drive, muscle production, hair growth in various places, and even hair loss in those with an MPB X-chromosome. It tends to make personalities cold, unemotional, tough, and logical among other things. Estrogen and progesterone are all about being soft, emotional, and feminine and contribute to developing female physical characteristics such as breast development among other things. They tend to be better with people skills and language. In recent times we have a lot of chemicals out there that are turning the frogs gay. They disrupt the proper development of male and female in the wombs of mothers, and then possible with on going exposure mess with people throughout their development and possibly even in their current states post-development. Of course if you're a libtard, you don't want to acknowledge this and don't even have a proper framework to admit that it is even a disruption in the first place. People are born how they are, and they are wonderful no matter what. As a none-leftist/libtard, I acknowledge we have a perception of the genders of male and female. It is skewed and ambiguous. Whereas one type of idiot refuses to believe there are exceptions, another type of idiot refuses to believe there are averages and patterns. As far as identical twins in this mess, I'm sure a leftist can find the one exception. Studies of identical twins raised in separate households found they are the most like each other, the second most like their biological parents, and the least like the people who raised them. I'm sure somewhere now there's one twin who ended up in the household of a libtard woman with her soy cuck, and the woman will most likely be looking for the slightest sign that a boy is a girl or a girl is a boy with no acknowledgement that children are often curious, exploratory, and ultimately, unrealistic idiots. I guess then we'll get to see how leftist parenting really screws a person up. I'm sure the twin raised in a normal household will feel like they dodged a bullet.

link