He would chuck all the wood that a woodchuck could if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that a woodchuck could.
(if his dentures were any good.)
Some.
If a Woodchuck would chuck wood a Woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a Woodchuck could if a Woodchuck could chuck wood.
Assuming a woodchuck could chuck wood, it would chuck as much wood as it could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Obviously.
A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
That wood chuck isn't chucking any fucking wood.
I blasted him, and all his fucking friends, and family for a farmer, who's cow broke it's leg in a wood chuck hole.
Even had an added little bonus when I turned in their tails for $1 each.
17
None cause we are beavers!
Groundhogs don't do anything with wood.
Not a groundhog, a woodchuck.
Yes. Same thing.
Woodchuck, Chuck, Wuchak, Groundpig, Pasture Pig, Wejack, Woodshaw, Whistlepig, Woodshock, Thick Wood Badger, Mamot, Monax, Moonack, Redmonk, Weenusk, Landbeaver, aka Marmota Monax, the common groundhog.
No they're not. A groundhog is a groundhog and a woodchuck is a woodchuck.
(post is archived)