JFK ed.
If somebody sucked up to AIPAC and did the usual "kiss the ring" routine to jews, then completely "180'd" once elected, they'd be dead in a month.
jfk'd
The Jews prevent that from happening by only allowing candidates who have Jewish bloodlines. Whether they're able to rig it on election day or not and no matter what happens, one of their own will always end up as President.
Trump, Hillary, Biden - All have bloodlines that are now Jewish. None of them would put their Jewish families in danger by telling the truth about the Jews.
This is why anyone who says they must openly challenge Jews or they serve Jews are admitting those staking this are themselves literally retarded or a Jew shill. Period.
Same with those pushing the image of trump and other POTUS' at the wall. You kiss the ring or you are excluded. Those staking this are themselves literally retarded or a Jew shill. Period.
Ghadaffi and Saddam tried that.
Something else, here's the comment: Short answer, please bear in mind, it's really complicated... They would name the jew and immediately need to end the federal reserve, as we know it. The money we have is fiat currency, it's based on nothing. (No, it's not based on oil, that's bullshit.) That would have to change. Precious metals would be the first go to. Upon this change, the rest of the world markets would start to demand payment in gold, silver, platinum, etc. So the US would have to do a few things to make this stop or we could (could, yes) run out of precious metals. (The world market is massive. It would take gold by the tonnage in minutes...) Close the boarders. No traffic in or out. Stop all trade agreements and set up new ones. We would face the world and demand payment to us in precious metals or the US would not be doing trading with said foreign country. (That's a lot of trade agreements.) There's more, and other money backing options, but historically, precious metals have always been the go to. By the way, thank Abe Lincoln for the greenback. Getting the Jews to self deport is a whole nother matter. It's doable, just complicated logistically speaking. I have my own ideas on this, but I won't be sharing them here anymore. My nipples don't need a vacation. LMFAO!
The banking families own all of the gold. They've controlled most of the above ground supply for centuries, and it's only gotten worse.
It's a bad idea to base your currency on an asset that's majority owned by your opponents. They fully own the markets for it as well. They game the shit out of the price to everyone elses' detriment.
Hitler opted out of a gold-backed currency entirely, and based the currency on the labor of the German people. The important part is that he kicked the Rothschilds out.
I like your idea about trade agreements. That's critical, because without revising them to protect the national interest, trade would be used as a weapon to destroy our economy from the outside.
You can learn a lot about this by studying up on Weimar Germany and the transition to Hitler being in power. I think it would be tough to do a better job at reviving the national economy than Hitler did in pre-WW2 Germany.
Oh, I agree with you about who owns the majority of the above ground commodity, but I can't say too much about the specific transfer of that wealth anymore. The US would name the jew and with the cooperation of the rest of the world, (via several years and every intelligence agency we have along with endless wetwork/black ops) the jew simply wouldn't have use for said earthly possession. Yes it's very possible to immediately transfer the currency to man hours production, but it wouldn't be prudent to leave it there indefinitely. Eventually, it would come back to metals.
based the currency on the labor of the German people
What does that even mean? A gold-backed currency is redeemable at any time in gold. The gold holds its value because it can't be printed like money.
A gold-backed currency is redeemable at any time in gold.
History begs to differ. The fractional reserve banking system was the legalization of the practice of banks printing more gold certificates than they had in the vault. That's literally the genesis story of fractional reserve banking.
The gold holds its value because it can't be printed like money.
Now when banking families own 99% of the supply and control the market. The gold market is highly leveraged and they can crush the price at will. If they see your country in a financially vulnerable state, such as leveraged in debt because of a war, all they have to do is suppress the price of gold to drive you into insolvency.
More silver fantasies...
Worth it for you to read:
A precious metals "standard" is not a fantasy, it is part our American history:
Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution provides that Congress has the power " [t]o coin money."
The U.S. dollar was originally defined under a bimetallic standard of 371.25 grains (24.057 g) (0.7735 troy ounces) fine silver or, from 1837, 23.22 grains (1.505 g) fine gold, or $20.67 per troy ounce. The Gold Standard Act of 1900 linked the dollar solely to gold. From 1934, its equivalence to gold was revised to $35 per troy ounce. Since 1971, all links to gold have been repealed. There are other options, but the historical "standard" has always been gold and silver. Once all the radioactive metals are taken out of the equation, there isn't much left that will hold up to being handled or knocked around in the pocket.
History teachers us many things, all we have to do is learn our true history. I have a coin from ancient Roman times. I have one from before that, approximately 2,500+ years old, from South America. They're both silver.
America was taken from Whites. Our money was just part of that taking. For instance, I strongly suspect that Fort Knox's vaults are barren, emptied decades ago, by the peoples who stole our country.
Ohhhh I am well aware of all this. I have had mid 6 figs in metals in the past. I hand-drew the BTC\GLD chart weekly on paper and the BTC\SLV chart weekly on paper. What a disaster holding metals was...
I just don't see a return to the old ways in a digital world. The reason is because the internet exists. If\when that all goes away then the old ways can return but I just don't see it happening.
Good ideas
I don't think you would even have to go that far to get assassinated. I think if someone like Ron Paul or Corbyn had been elected and merely scuppered globalist ambitions they would have assassinated them.
If they could 3, then 2.
Look at the 2 Republican front runners. Trump and DeSantis. Both will do anything for Israel. If Israel asked for $200 billion they'd give $300b.
No one will ever be in a position to be president that ever says anything negative about them
Trump publicly stated Jews control congress. Trump stated globalist means Jews.
You should stop swallowing everything Jews push in your direction.
No. He did not say jews control congress. He said Israel did 10-15 years ago and BLAMED Obama for their decline. He said it's sad to see the decline thanks to Obama and Biden. Trump literally thinks its a bad thing that Israel were losing power in Congress.
Lol. I see why you have your tag.
It would have to be done before the censors could get to it, probably during a live widely viewed event like the inaugural address or State of the Union speech.
Bump for comments. I ponder gold vs labor backed currency
Yeah, JFK. He was fighting against Israel having nukes, then he gave his "secret societies" speech as a not-so-subtle warning to team Rothschild. We all know how that ended. He was murdered less than two weeks after that speech.
1 & 2. I find it hard to believe any sitting President would be allowed to be on a ballot if there wasn't something blackmailable on them. Trump probably has a walkin closet full of skeletons. DeSantis hits me as the kiddy didler type.
(post is archived)