SR-71. - Color checks out. - Government put a lot of focus on it. - Extremely expensive to maintain, none of which it does for itself, always relying on others. - Sneaky. - Hangs out around several neighborhoods at night checking out properties. - Runs away really fast if you shoot at it. -Cant shoot for shit itself.
OP should have specified "able to actually fly for more than ten seconds".
Wheel chocks on a flat tire.
MIG-15. Produced in mass numbers, temperamental, quick but couldn't take a hit, rarely engaged head-on without overwhelming numbers, would often dive down from altitude and hit someone in the back before fleeing, etc.
The Embraer EM-120 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embraer_EMB_120_Brasilia
Loud, unreliable, no one likes it.
DC-10, it just doesn't work.
cessna 172?
you have my attention... why?
sorry for the late reply..
it is good for training and whatnot. i never relax when i'm flying one. the cabins that i have been in usually smells like catfood and shit, mixed with geriatric ass sweat mine have usually failed one or more test, but are passed anyway, because noone wants to admit that the maintenance work was not done. they ARE a workhorse, but its not something that you take a pretty girl in, unless you also want to put a cigerette out on her forehead. also, the ones that i have been in, consume large quantities of fuel, because they havent been tuned up in about two decades. But, they have good tires usually, because well.... they just do. oh yeah, and they are loud.. only white people can take care of them.
Ah, interesting lol
Did a lot of flying with my friend 10-15 years ago when he got his pilots license. I would go up with him and we'd putz around landing at various airports or flying to places that had lunch available. My favorite flight is looping around manhattan.
You are right about the smell. We had access to a 172 and 182 and the 182 just smelled like an old bowling alley. I think it was an older model, like 1980 or so.
Kek
(post is archived)