WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

821

I think everything should be legal but discouraged when they create degeneracy and sloth. This also must accompany an end to consequence-free use (no help if you OD). The public cannot be paying for the sins of its individuals.

I think everything should be legal but discouraged when they create degeneracy and sloth. This also must accompany an end to consequence-free use (no help if you OD). The public cannot be paying for the sins of its individuals.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts (edited )

But there would be legitimate competition because most drugs are stupid easy to make.

Some require fancy processes, it's true. Most do not.

But if everyone could sell insulin, tirzepitides, ivermectin, antifungal, antibiotics, AND stuff that gets you recreational high, without all the red tape; there'd be a sea change in who held financial capital, intellectual property and political power.

Forget drugs, for a second.

Imagine if copyright laws reset to day zero tomorrow morning. Who would lose the most money?

Imagine if you had safe nuclear reactor, desalination combos in large numbers along the coast to keep water and energy dirt cheap and reservoirs full. Who would lose the most money?

Legalizing drugs simply steals copyright protections/regulatory captures already established by the cartels.

Every community should be implementing a worldwide network of nuclear power that vapor distills sea water upwards into hydroelectric reservoir systems. Mother nature has already done 90% of the work and the Great Distraction is to prevent exactly this type of sustainable paradise.

This endeavor would naturally occur if power wasn't consolidated into the hands of evil men.