Didn't any of you read one of the several articles surrounding this case that covered gun protocol on movie sets? There is an employee, called the "armorer" or "gun master" whose sole job consists of handling the guns. The actor shooting that gun in front of the cameras has absolutely no control over the ammunition in his gun. Somehow, live ammunition got mixed into the dummy rounds. That's what the investigation is about. How did live ammo get there? Sorry, but why don't I see more evidence of people learning and retaining knowledge in this forum?
Because even here so many have the normie/ npc 5 minute concentration spans from overconsumption of msm and goyslop - shit in shit out.
routinely see questions posed by users about something that may have occurred several weeks to several months prior and they asking somew lame normie shit that has already been gone over with literal or actual source material.
I just asked a hypothetical question.
But you're right. We shouldn't question what the media owners tell us to believe. That would be un-American. And probably anti-semitic.
Revolvers require special treatment when it comes to blanks and dummy rounds since the audience can often see what's in the cylinder. Industry standards include numerous safety protocols such as aiming revolvers over the shoulder when pointing at another actor, moving the crew away when pointing at the camera, using ballistic glass between the camera and the gun, separating functional guns from pure props, etc.
Baldwin ignored all of those and more.
Pointing the gun at her and pulling the trigger was not part of the script. He was playing with a gun and that is always extremely negligent. The threshold for manslaughter is negligence. He is guilty.
Why are you unable to think for yourself to see this blatant truth?
(post is archived)