WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

I realize this is highly 'merica-centric, but it's worth thinking about...

I realize this is highly 'merica-centric, but it's worth thinking about...

(post is archived)

[–] 14 pts

Not much would change. The jews would still subvert society. Remember, all wars are banker's wars.

[–] 7 pts

Yep. Remember, the jews were in the majority of slave owners.

[–] 2 pts

alas, if only the Civil War was primarily over the institution of slavery...

[–] 2 pts

It wasn’t, but you know about rewritten history though.

[–] 1 pt

It wasn't even in small part, at all because of slavery.

[–] 5 pts

The Rothschilds were financing the Confederacy in order to force the Union to take out loans from European banks that were also owned by the Rothschilds, so that both sides would end up heavily indebted to, and controlled by, them, no matter what the outcome.

"Heads, they win. Tails, you lose."

[–] 1 pt

...and controlled by, them, no matter what the outcome.

Entirely false. Had the South won, jews wouldn't have been able to hold political office - at any level. This would have completely ended any attempt of control by way of (((banking))) and that general idea jews use of funding both sides doesn't work.

[–] 1 pt

This. The US would be split and then it would have split again. Then ended as individual states broke off and began to squabble over borders.