WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

181

I want an actual definition of a human.

Nothing about whatever race or religion shouldn't be included.

I want to know what a human is.

I want an actual definition of a human. Nothing about whatever race or religion shouldn't be included. I want to know what a human is.

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

A genetically engineered space monkey, bred purposefully as a slave species to mine gold long ago.

But our original creators found an easier source for gold and abandoned us on this planet eons ago.

[–] 1 pt

to mine gold long ago

So that's why I like my shiny so much.

[–] 0 pt

I like this theory. The affinity for gold as always seemed suspicious.

What makes you believe this?

[–] 4 pts

I don't necessarily believe it. I've studied the Bible a lot and I like to expand my understanding of God.

Atheists simply infuriate me with their "sky daddy" mockery and insistence on an ordered, precise, infinite universe coming about from an explosion and chaos with no intelligence.

God isn't "sky daddy." A common cartoon in pop culture is the old man, sitting atop a cloud, and for most people, that is all they know of God.

For us humans, we were created in the image of our creator, and birthed into a precisely ordered universe.

Now whatever you want to take God as, a mystical omniscient, omnipotent force, an alien race, a computer programmer of the greatest simulation, we are made in His image.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, gonna have to be honest right there.

I really don't want to be made in God's Image.

Cuz I'm real fucked up in the brain.

[–] 0 pt

Am confident am created in image of the creator. Am creator.

[–] 0 pt

"We are made in his image" is a testament to the arrogance of man

[–] 0 pt

This is the annunaki stuff isn't it

[–] 2 pts

IQ > 100

[–] 2 pts

A human is an non-omnipotent entity that can understand metaphor, but is not a Demon, Angel, or Octopus.

[+] [deleted] 2 pts
[–] 1 pt

Unlike gender a species are on a spectrum.

[–] 1 pt

Humans are assholes for the most part

[–] 1 pt

What's the context? What must they be differentiated between? Does it need to cover a whole range of hypothetical creatures with some/many qualities like us?

[–] 0 pt

You are a nerd named Webster. Love words like a modern day man loves Anime Girls. Need to define words, like modern day man needs to define his waifu. Define human.

[–] 1 pt

here is an evolution based answer, some one who foremost wishes to procreate with a viable mate for the express purpose of making viable offspring.

So no niggers or faggots.

That includes all types of niggers: taconiggers, pineappleniggers, sandniggers, etc, who immediately abandon parental responsibility

Also under faggots please include: dykes, trannies, and any one of the 58 new genders and/or 378 "sexual orientations," oh and pedo's.

[–] 0 pt

Why do you want to procreate?

[–] 1 pt

You can't avoid using race to define humans, unless you want to use the common definition which includes all extant races.

Scientists usually define clades (groups of related species) using one of two formulas:

1) Everything descended from the most recent common ancestor of X and Y

2) Everything more related to X than to Y

Choose one of those two formulas and then plug in X and Y to generate definition. For example you could say that a human is everything descended from the most recent common ancestor of homo sapiens and homo erectus. That's a very broad definition. You could say that a human is everything more related to Whites than to niggers. That is a pretty narrow definition.

[–] 0 pt

i wish you could use fewer words.

[–] 1 pt

Going to follow the science, and say....homo.

[–] 0 pt

Follow the science Goy. You're a Homo. And you're ancestors? Yeah, they were Erectus.

[–] 1 pt

"I'm a homo you're a homo he's a homo she's a homo, wouldn't you like to be a homo..." SLAM oven door shuts

Load more (5 replies)