Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

774

What force or group is pushing the tranny agenda on everyone?

I recently did a few thoughtful responses around the Internet on why trannyism is, essentially, evil. This resulted in the most heavy handed banning of multiple accounts that I've experienced since Hunter Bidens laptop.

The FBI wants you to be trannies. Why? Who is giving them marching orders?

What's the point of pushing everyone to be trannies?

What is the top of the leadership that pushes this agenda?

What force or group is pushing the tranny agenda on everyone? I recently did a few thoughtful responses around the Internet on why trannyism is, essentially, evil. This resulted in the most heavy handed banning of multiple accounts that I've experienced since Hunter Bidens laptop. The FBI wants you to be trannies. Why? Who is giving them marching orders? What's the point of pushing everyone to be trannies? What is the top of the leadership that pushes this agenda?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (61).
[–] • 0 pt

What about pedophilia in talmud? Is that "revisionist crap" too?

[–] • 1 pt

I haven't found any. And from their obsession with virginity I don't even see how it would work. There is even a reference to Job explaining that it may be advisable not to even look at a virgin, for if she marries then you've looked at a married woman....

And he (Job) said [Job xxxi. 1]: "A covenant have I made with my eyes: how then should I fix my looks on a virgin?" Infer from this that job was so scrupulous with himself that he did not even look at a virgin. This is to be made an a fortiori conclusion--namely, if a virgin whom he could marry himself, or to his son, brother, or relatives was not looked upon by him because he was so rigorous with himself, so much the more did he refrain from looking at a married woman. But what was the reason that Job was so rigorous with himself as regards looking at a virgin? Because he thought, if I look at her to-day (and like her) and to-morrow she marries some one else, I will have looked on (and liked) a married woman.

I'm no scholar, but that's the atmosphere of the thing. Lots of stuff like this. How can pedophilia coexist with that?

[–] • 2 pts

What about pedophilia in talmud?

I haven't found any.

Oy Vey, Moshe. You’re not fooling anyone.

[–] • 1 pt

I will concede that I am a jew only because I'm not interested in arguing the counterpoint. Really, I am not one, but if you'd like to think that then so be it. It has nothing to do with what's actually in the Talmud.

Why don't you download a pdf copy of the Talmud and quote all the sick shit that's in there? Why is everyone content to link to articles written by demon possessed transfag jews rather than doing their own reading and thinking? Why let one transfag jew tell you about his Talmud and how you should think about it? The text is available. Cite it. Expose the Jew with their own words.

If you think logic has three values: true, false, and jewish, then you will dismiss everything I say as jewish. But if instead you prefer reason then there is no excuse for not reading and citing the source text. Show me the pedophilia.