They walked. A landbridge was exposed due to low sea levels. The same way UK/North America was populated.
Yep. During the last ice Age sea level was around 400 feet lower than today.
Yep, until the end of the Younger Dryas (~10,000 BC) the land extended all the way to the continental shelf in America, and the Ice sheets were over a mile thick in North America. Most of Indonesia, to include Australia were connected via land bridges during this time in large part due to the sheer amount of water that was locked up in the ice sheets.
OP, check out Randal Carlson, he is super passionate about explaining all of the science behind what happened during this extinction event.
Aprox 13,000 years ago, 11,600-11,800bc.
Although there are some stories that can be put together about others showing up there on boats (after the aborigines were already there).
Yeah theyll be the Torres Strait Islanders, while black, theyre not the same type of nigger, and actually have a celebration every year called 'Coming of the Light' which CELEBRATES EUROPEANS ARRIVING
Arabs showed up on the west coast about 500 years ago, found literally nothing of value and left.
Makes no difference in areas like bering sea when that froze over
But in regard to to OP's question, it surely made a difference in tropical Indonesia.
It's in general acceptance European Aryan giants cross land bridge of ice 30k years ago into American and desovins or modern natives came 15k years ago from Asia across ice into Alaska then down through bc and Canada into North erica
another theory is humanity evolved in Aus and walked to Europe...
Aboriginal DNA says niggers from migration. natives have plenty of stories about the Aryan giants cannibalizing their people from the moment they reached NA. My bud is half Seminole we talk about lures and old tales of his people
So you agree the sea level has risen? Due to climate change????
For the ice age to have ended necessarily means that the climate changed.
The fact that the climate changes isn't really in dispute, I don't think. It clearly does, albeit over very long periods of time that far outlast any human generation.
What's in dispute is:
A) That it has anything to do with what humans do or don't do.. EG cows farting, eating meat, driving a gas-powered vehicle, etc. etc. B) That humans can influence or control anything having to do with the climate.
To which I respond, that it doesn't and we can't, respectively.
What's never discussed by the climate change/global warming/global freezing alarmists is the sun's natural cycles...which have far more to do with the climate on this planet than anything and everything else combined. Those cycles may be hundreds or thousands of years long, so it's easy for the socialist assholes to ignore them or pretend that they don't exist.. simply because they don't have them figured out or because it would fuck up their narrative to mention it.. even though the sun is BY FAR the biggest fucking influence on earth's climate. But then, they can't tax the sun for some bullshit reasons, but they can tax you for some bullshit reasons..
Hence, why "climate change" is even a topic of discussion in the first place: it's about nothing more than tricking you into letting government fuckwads control even more of your everyday life.
no......people just like making houses under water...
(post is archived)