Do you really want to live in a country where your commie cousins are out voting you?
That situation is not ideal and I admit I have people who are left in my extended family. What would suffice for me is to get back to pre 2000 Sweden, it was not ideal but it was so much better oh boy, and put rules in place to stop the last 20 years or degeneration.
Isn't it easier to declare communism to be illegal, or semi-illegal, rather than to at a global, or at least international, level create a forced migration program? Laws that the population must be at least 90% Aryan etc. I don't know but there must be plenty of ideas out there. Removal of women's voting rights and/or raising the voting age to 25.
Forcing people to move will make the connection between land and people weaker. When I look at a Cathedral that's 100s of years old does it not have value to be able to say "my people did this"? If you move it makes you a foreigner (at least until you hopefully meld into the population).
Also what will happen with local languages if your idea was implemented? Would they survive or would there only be a world wide lingua franca left (English?). Why are local languages important? I think it is what has saved Hungary and what has allowed them to retain their culture abd basedness. Hungarians suck at English in my experience (even a some/lot of young ones) and Hungarian is said to be a difficult language to learn. The language barrier have saved them from the poison that, sadly, comes to a large extent currently from the English speaking world.
I am not sure how your system would ensure that countries would remain ideologically the same.
A population no matter how perfectly ie capitalist they are, and no matter how perfectly the constitution etc is written, will inevitably have communist children. It's a matter of percentages and falling far enough from the tree.
If a country does not have a method of ejecting incompatible ideologicals, then they will form groups and start reproducing on their own.
This naturally will lead to degradation of the country, civil war or balkanization etc. As these groups will want to live under a government of their ideology.
No country that doesn't have a way of ejecting those who are ideologically incompatible will inevitably fail.
No country that doesn't have a way of ejecting those who are ideologically incompatible will inevitably fail.
I think that's true. Western Aryan civilization lasted for a long while though 100s or even 1000s of years. It was great. Though it wasn't robust enough, and now we are here, so even though it was very great indeed it contained flaws that eventually made it derail.
Since it was pretty impressive though, cant we take a look at Western culture and just try to modify/improve it a bit in order to make it last longer (the next time)? I'm not exactly sure when it derailed, woman suffrage is one of the original sins of the West but i don't think it's the first one because the French Revolution happened earlier (?).
Or maybe we just needed to be (way) harsher against all people showing signs of leftism? Or maybe we inevitably got soft as we got richer, so getting rich was the original sin (good times make weak men etc)?
Well based on the way you're saying it derailed. That it lasted for 1000s of years. It seems the point which caused it to fail "recently" was speedier and "masser" forms of transportation.
Boats are what allowed slaves to come over. Now long distance instant communication teamed with other forms of even faster and better and "masser' forms of transportation are allowing highly coordinating, mass, long distance "immigration".
Maybe any country worth moving to will NEVER be able to survive this from here out.
(post is archived)