Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

870

Essentially all countries would have to become very competitive for people or they'd almost immediately be out of existence. Countries that were the greatest would have to be selective on who they let in or they'd go to shit quick.

Rules are - 1 - You HAVE to move to another country at 18. So if you're already in country #1 you have to move to country #2. 2 - The country you move to has to be the best that will take you, no next door country etc.

Essentially all countries would have to become very competitive for people or they'd almost immediately be out of existence. Countries that were the greatest would have to be selective on who they let in or they'd go to shit quick. Rules are - 1 - You HAVE to move to another country at 18. So if you're already in country #1 you have to move to country #2. 2 - The country you move to has to be the best that will take you, no next door country etc.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (14).
[–] • 0 pt

A population no matter how perfectly ie capitalist they are, and no matter how perfectly the constitution etc is written, will inevitably have communist children. It's a matter of percentages and falling far enough from the tree.

If a country does not have a method of ejecting incompatible ideologicals, then they will form groups and start reproducing on their own.

This naturally will lead to degradation of the country, civil war or balkanization etc. As these groups will want to live under a government of their ideology.

No country that doesn't have a way of ejecting those who are ideologically incompatible will inevitably fail.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

No country that doesn't have a way of ejecting those who are ideologically incompatible will inevitably fail.

I think that's true. Western Aryan civilization lasted for a long while though 100s or even 1000s of years. It was great. Though it wasn't robust enough, and now we are here, so even though it was very great indeed it contained flaws that eventually made it derail.

Since it was pretty impressive though, cant we take a look at Western culture and just try to modify/improve it a bit in order to make it last longer (the next time)? I'm not exactly sure when it derailed, woman suffrage is one of the original sins of the West but i don't think it's the first one because the French Revolution happened earlier (?).

Or maybe we just needed to be (way) harsher against all people showing signs of leftism? Or maybe we inevitably got soft as we got richer, so getting rich was the original sin (good times make weak men etc)?

[–] • 1 pt

Well based on the way you're saying it derailed. That it lasted for 1000s of years. It seems the point which caused it to fail "recently" was speedier and "masser" forms of transportation.

Boats are what allowed slaves to come over. Now long distance instant communication teamed with other forms of even faster and better and "masser' forms of transportation are allowing highly coordinating, mass, long distance "immigration".

Maybe any country worth moving to will NEVER be able to survive this from here out.