Should an amendment to the bill of rights have been made that the government could not ban ownership of anything you could possibly own?

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

942

•

If guns were never supposed to be bannable, then what else would the government ever need to ban? Why not just double down and say the government could never ban ANYTHING of your possible ownership?

It would also double as a second 2A as well.

If guns were never supposed to be bannable, then what else would the government ever need to ban? Why not just double down and say the government could never ban ANYTHING of your possible ownership? It would also double as a second 2A as well.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (6).

[–] • 4 pts

Pointless and stupid. This is already established by the 4th and 10th.

The solution to those not following the words is force not more words.

link