Should an amendment to the bill of rights have been made that the government could not ban ownership of anything you could possibly own?

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

963

•

If guns were never supposed to be bannable, then what else would the government ever need to ban? Why not just double down and say the government could never ban ANYTHING of your possible ownership?

It would also double as a second 2A as well.

If guns were never supposed to be bannable, then what else would the government ever need to ban? Why not just double down and say the government could never ban ANYTHING of your possible ownership? It would also double as a second 2A as well.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (6).

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

It doesn't matter what the laws say if those in power can ignore them without repercussions. The problem isn't that we need more clear laws, the problem is that jews now hold power in all branches of government so simply ignore any restrictions on their power they don't want to obey.

link