The enemy within will of course be a stand-in for jews,
No. Here's why; The jew is the enemy and must be distinguished from "the enemy within" as "the enemy within" are not jews but are surrogates of jews. They're saboteurs through will or lack thereof.
I'm thinking I will incorporate some of the history of the Khazars into this,
Great. jews aren't khazers aren't jews. Stop pushing that lie. It's been posted about so often here there is no possible way you've not read it. It's gone over in vide 1, 2 or 3 (probably 2) in Asha Logos': Conspiracy - Our Subverted History series.
...a nation of people heavily degenerated who were abducting and sacrificing the children of their neighboring kingdoms to their dark god.
Not Khazers. jews did that to khazers and as you state neighbors. jews shapeshifted, gene thieved, married into houses of import. They were not khazer stock.
Protagonist will be a young man who always felt something was "off" about the common world view of those around him and the direction of his kingdom. Inciting incident will likely be something to do with discovering a ritual child sacrifice by jews who hold positions of power in his kingdom.
You're not writing an allegory if it's going to be long enough to set up a storyline of this depth.
e; Poal reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaally needs to stop believing jew lies about themselves and their origin. jews are from nowhere near Europe, they're from the middle of Asia.
Great. jews aren't khazers aren't jews. Stop pushing that lie. It's been posted about so often here there is no possible way you've not read it. It's gone over in vide 1, 2 or 3 (probably 2) in Asha Logos': Conspiracy - Our Subverted History series.
I've only seen it once before here. And I couldn't get the poster to share any kind of documentation so I wrote him off as a jew. I'm still not inclined to believe it and it doesn't fit with what I've seen of history, but since you shared a direction to more information, I'll look at it with an open mind.
Here: https://poal.co/c/dd5974e4-91d2-471d-aa37-6192ec9ad8fc#cmnts
Follow the chain of links.
Good stuff. And pretty consistent with things I've posted before in other threads.
https://poal.co/s/memes/601860/427b7426-3f4a-43d7-8ca2-2b46aff7f488
https://poal.co/s/jews/600852/a02cb5df-7e0c-4e28-bd37-b8eb92233946
A lot of the problem comes from the (apparently intentional) muddling of terminology. The Israelites (most of the descendants of Jacob) are not modern Israelis and are not the people we now know as jews (the occupiers of Israel and Judeah after they were conquered by Babylon and returned). But Abraham is called the father of Judaism by the people now known as jews. It gets even more mixed up from there. Point is, any two people talking about jews are very likely to be talking about two different groups of people. Sometimes even one person will use the term jews to refer to two completely different groups of people in the same paragraph, just because they're in the same chronological narrative (by that logic, one might also refer to Greeks, Romans, and Samaritans as jews, though almost anyone would understand how that is absurd).
You seriously think jews are from ANYWHERE near the region?
I've seen of history
You mean what you're told is history.* Think about traits of jews. Lying, thieving, manipulating, fecal fixation, baby rape, cannibalism. There is a very specific and parrticular area between "peoples" who together share those same traits. Between India and China, where (((gog and magog))) are based. It's in one of the videos. It was the one asked me about and made his own post on after researching it. Maybe he remembers the specific video. Now that I think about it, it was the Alexander The Great video.
e; The Khazer explanation bit may not be that video, I forget, but the (((Gog and Magog))) bit is.
You seriously think jews are from ANYWHERE near the region?
No, I think they moved in there and impersonated/supplanted the people who were from that region.
Of course they lie. Water is wet, everyone dies, jews lie and steal. There are few universal constants, but that's one of them. Whatever they present in the history books is misleading at best, obviously. But there should be hints of what really happened if you can dig in and get source material from before they subverted it, and likely find hints that seem incongruous but fit well once you get rid of the jewish revisions. That's most of what I'm basing my understanding of history on. If there are more sources, or sources analyzed by intelligent people, then I'm interested in reading them and I'm willing to reevaluate what I think I know with the new information.
"the enemy within" are not jews but are surrogates of jews. They're saboteurs through will or lack thereof.
Someone should start a civnat movement to take a hard look at the (((freemasons))).
(((civnat)))
No.
How better to address the fraternity that is subordinate to your enemy, who acts as a race, and racially diverse but to create criticism that is sterilized of racial tone? I mean you can fuck up the whole thing by (you)ing one of the most famous and accurate political comics about jews of all time, trashing the optics game early on but some people just can't troll 4chan how they did back in my day.
(post is archived)