Have you read "Turner Diaries" or "Camp of the Saints"? Could be some inspiration in there.
I've read Turner Diaries but not Camp of the Saints (yet).
Since there is a lot of rumors about the newest Elder Scrolls and Hammerfell. Lmao
Don't forget banks.
The evil group could be financed by a bank and at some point the bank could be found to be completely empty.
Oh and the crown could be in debt to said bank.
Redpilling can come in the form of noticing all the political drama is a show and both sides are jews.
Even the uproar over discovering child sacrifice will be argued amongst jews on jewish shows. And their arguments will purposefully frame the sacrifice in some good way
Your Christianity proxy religion can be ironically mutilated by jews to worship them too. Since born again boomers basically betray Jesus for israel
The enemy within will of course be a stand-in for jews,
No. Here's why; The jew is the enemy and must be distinguished from "the enemy within" as "the enemy within" are not jews but are surrogates of jews. They're saboteurs through will or lack thereof.
I'm thinking I will incorporate some of the history of the Khazars into this,
Great. jews aren't khazers aren't jews. Stop pushing that lie. It's been posted about so often here there is no possible way you've not read it. It's gone over in vide 1, 2 or 3 (probably 2) in Asha Logos': Conspiracy - Our Subverted History series.
...a nation of people heavily degenerated who were abducting and sacrificing the children of their neighboring kingdoms to their dark god.
Not Khazers. jews did that to khazers and as you state neighbors. jews shapeshifted, gene thieved, married into houses of import. They were not khazer stock.
Protagonist will be a young man who always felt something was "off" about the common world view of those around him and the direction of his kingdom. Inciting incident will likely be something to do with discovering a ritual child sacrifice by jews who hold positions of power in his kingdom.
You're not writing an allegory if it's going to be long enough to set up a storyline of this depth.
e; Poal reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaally needs to stop believing jew lies about themselves and their origin. jews are from nowhere near Europe, they're from the middle of Asia.
Great. jews aren't khazers aren't jews. Stop pushing that lie. It's been posted about so often here there is no possible way you've not read it. It's gone over in vide 1, 2 or 3 (probably 2) in Asha Logos': Conspiracy - Our Subverted History series.
I've only seen it once before here. And I couldn't get the poster to share any kind of documentation so I wrote him off as a jew. I'm still not inclined to believe it and it doesn't fit with what I've seen of history, but since you shared a direction to more information, I'll look at it with an open mind.
Here: https://poal.co/c/dd5974e4-91d2-471d-aa37-6192ec9ad8fc#cmnts
Follow the chain of links.
Good stuff. And pretty consistent with things I've posted before in other threads.
https://poal.co/s/memes/601860/427b7426-3f4a-43d7-8ca2-2b46aff7f488
https://poal.co/s/jews/600852/a02cb5df-7e0c-4e28-bd37-b8eb92233946
A lot of the problem comes from the (apparently intentional) muddling of terminology. The Israelites (most of the descendants of Jacob) are not modern Israelis and are not the people we now know as jews (the occupiers of Israel and Judeah after they were conquered by Babylon and returned). But Abraham is called the father of Judaism by the people now known as jews. It gets even more mixed up from there. Point is, any two people talking about jews are very likely to be talking about two different groups of people. Sometimes even one person will use the term jews to refer to two completely different groups of people in the same paragraph, just because they're in the same chronological narrative (by that logic, one might also refer to Greeks, Romans, and Samaritans as jews, though almost anyone would understand how that is absurd).
You seriously think jews are from ANYWHERE near the region?
I've seen of history
You mean what you're told is history.* Think about traits of jews. Lying, thieving, manipulating, fecal fixation, baby rape, cannibalism. There is a very specific and parrticular area between "peoples" who together share those same traits. Between India and China, where (((gog and magog))) are based. It's in one of the videos. It was the one asked me about and made his own post on after researching it. Maybe he remembers the specific video. Now that I think about it, it was the Alexander The Great video.
e; The Khazer explanation bit may not be that video, I forget, but the (((Gog and Magog))) bit is.
You seriously think jews are from ANYWHERE near the region?
No, I think they moved in there and impersonated/supplanted the people who were from that region.
Of course they lie. Water is wet, everyone dies, jews lie and steal. There are few universal constants, but that's one of them. Whatever they present in the history books is misleading at best, obviously. But there should be hints of what really happened if you can dig in and get source material from before they subverted it, and likely find hints that seem incongruous but fit well once you get rid of the jewish revisions. That's most of what I'm basing my understanding of history on. If there are more sources, or sources analyzed by intelligent people, then I'm interested in reading them and I'm willing to reevaluate what I think I know with the new information.
"the enemy within" are not jews but are surrogates of jews. They're saboteurs through will or lack thereof.
Someone should start a civnat movement to take a hard look at the (((freemasons))).
(((civnat)))
No.
How better to address the fraternity that is subordinate to your enemy, who acts as a race, and racially diverse but to create criticism that is sterilized of racial tone? I mean you can fuck up the whole thing by (you)ing one of the most famous and accurate political comics about jews of all time, trashing the optics game early on but some people just can't troll 4chan how they did back in my day.
Since this is an awakening story I think the beginning should be written fully in the narrative of a liberal sheep. The way you adress issues should not elude to the fact that you doubt any leftist trope.
The protagonist should be an "ally". Fully supportive of leftist violence, censorship, and trans and LGB propaganda. To that effect I think he should be a high school student with a zipper tits and faggot friend. Zipper tits can confide in him all the hardships she is having with her choices, the way in which she feels she was manipulated etc. Only to have the protagonist "support" her decisions and gaslight her on why she feels mislead, blaming those feelings on society.
Later when zippertits kills herself the protagonist will have to struggle with the fact that he was partially responsible.
The protagonist can start to boubt his convictions when reading the suicide note.
For example at some point zipper tits will complain that whenever she tries to voice her concerns or displeasure with surgeries or hormones she gets censored. She gets frustrated and starts talking about how much harm the censorship is doing to her.
The protagonist then stops her to say that the censorship is a good thing because her anti trans feelings will get used to hurt other trans fags. That she is only one person who would benefit from free speech in this instance while thousands of trans fags would get hurt. Etc.
Then in the suicide note zipper tits will say that she found a support group of other zipper tits who all had the same experience. That there are hundreds of them but they were all censored so it looked like there were almost none. She will explain how she could have made changes as soon as she had doubts which would have made her life better but she didn't know because everything was censored. Now it is too late and she only has one way out. If only protagonist hadn't gaslit her she would have found the group earlier and made those changes.
Thought about writing it from the perspective of the jew? It would be too easy and tempting to make the bad guys one note villains because jews are literally mustache twirling villains, and also too tempting to write the protagonist as an idealised version of whites, which would basically be every superhero movie ever. Start off with the (((protagonist))) being told constantly that everyone hates him for no reason and all the 'unjust' punishment his family has suffered which spurs him to get even. Throughout he cheats and steals from everyone he can, especially good people which represents whites. One time he mistakenly steals from a (((family member))) and is severely punished all while parents turned a blind eye or shared in the theft of whites. Viewing whites from a secondary viewpoint could really highlight and define what it means to be white person. Heck give the jew a white friend at school who does things the right way and struggles with his chin up while the jews father shakes hands with the dean and he gets bumped up a class and the jew still complains anyway. Later he gets initiated into his families cult and meets powerful people behind closed doors and slowly finds out there were good reasons for all of the punishments his family faced while his white friend starts talking about the exact group he just joined and the fear he feels. The ending could be that his white childhood friend joins in a revolution to hunt his group down and he comes face to face or perhaps have the jew win and backstab his friend.
If it's allegorical you could swap jews for 'saturn' worshippers who are truly atheistic and devoid of spirit and instead worship their time on earth and avoid working for money the way whites do. Add a part where the white kid is working a job and the jew spends his time managing his money and skimming off the top, make it a running theme where the white kid does hard work and the jew takes his share in the reward.
I think it would make for a far more natural story that way and it would be far more insightful. The turner dairies was prescient but felt like a total power fantasy
Let's use "A" and "Z" as name placeholders.
Life is rough. A and Z are barely surviving. Z figures that if they work with the system, and serve their overlords, they will profit. A is against it and wants to keep his morals. Something happens, like they report some scummy White trash arms smugglers or something. (Or they do it by accident.) But they begin to prosper because they work with the system. A is still reluctant, but Z keeps convincing him. Over time they both find that life is easier working with the system instead of against it. They get deeper and deeper into being good little Goys because life is better. Every decision and action seems like a good idea at the time.
But then Z loses everything due to things he did working for the overlords. His family is arrested due to his previous actions. - Something like, the arms smugglers he got arrested also smuggled fruit that his dad sold. So his dad gets arrested by the system for selling healthy fruit instead of insects. - Things like that The characters were doing good things when siding with the system. But those good things can be spun into bad things. - Like banning hate speech seems like a good idea until criticising the government is called hate speech. Or unintended consequences - like making everyone wear a mask so people don't spit on others when they talk and spread fewer viruses. But then people continually wipe their virus covered hands all over their masks making them more likely to catch viruses. The point is that the characters did things that seem like the right thing to do at the time. They thought they were the good guys by siding with the system. But it turns out they weren't.
Z loses everything while nothing bad happens to A and he thrives. Z after losing everything to the system, Z goes full on against the system, while A justifies taking the easy route and all its benefits. - (The opposite of the way they were in the beginning.) A saying that Z was originally right to side with the system, just look at how good A's life is right now. With Z telling him that he was wrong and to look at Z's life right now. Z tells A that he'll eventually lose everything like he did.
So Z lost everything. A's life is great. Maybe A is recorded arguing with Z by a surveillance drone. Maybe a regular person records him. But in any case, some powerful people see A being not just a good Goy, but the best Goy.
A is recruited into an elite group of Goyim. People who the overlords control and hide behind. A learns all the tricks they use to keep the people weak, confused, and complacent. How they prevent any uprisings. How they retain control.
Maybe A thinks it's horrible immediately or over time, but A tries to do everything he can to take down the system. A working from the inside and Z working from the outside. All of the manipulation and control, they figure out how it's achieved and is described in detail (describing exactly how they do it to us right now), and they figure out ways to take it all down by learning how it works from the inside out. And that's the rest of the story. Describing how everything is controlled, the power and reach they have. And our characters taking the entire system down in much the same way that we need to in real life.
Sounds cool. Maybe you can give it a working title and keep us updated with regular posts under that title.
I'll try to come up with something, but to keep the ideas on track you will need to have a general story arch (preferably multiple story archs that interact), characters with personalities and speach patterns, time and place details so the story suggestions make sense in context.
With a working title everyone can make their suggestions in new posts, which will allow upvoting good ideas and discussions on each individually.
Maybe you could somehow work in the protagonist finds some recordings made by his Grandfather or Great Grandfather who served in the U S army , landed in Normandy and fought his way into Germany
In his old age Grandpa realizes we were all lied to , that ze evil Nazis were in fact the good guys .
Maybe give some examples of why he comes to this realization, with vivid recollections about battle thrown in too.
(post is archived)