FROM WIKIPEDIA Payne's definition of fascism focuses on three concepts: "Fascist negations" – anti-liberalism, anti-communism, and anti-conservatism. "Fascist goals" – the creation of a nationalist dictatorship to regulate economic structure and to transform social relations within a modern, self-determined culture, and the expansion of the nation into an empire. "Fascist style" – a political aesthetic of romantic symbolism, mass mobilization, a positive view of violence, and promotion of masculinity, youth, and charismatic authoritarian leadership. ... Generally it's difficult to get a non kiked definition of the term so it should be unsurprising that people use it incorrectly as synonymous with totalitarian control considering the pervasive influence of jewish media and the lack of defensive media define fascism. It's simply not valuable to defend fascism without having a snappy definition for it since it has become such a bloated word that jews hang all of their hatred on. Worse is when there aren't any arguments available for its defining characteristics. I think it's better to promote the values without the brand or make a new brand with the correct values even if it overlaps facism. It's just not helpful having to defend the definition of something slandered as much as fascism when trying to win over political opponents or neutrals, it's far better to subvert their programming and trick them into accepting fascist ideals and then inform them once the spell has been lifted. As for me I don't trust Wikipedia to give me fair info and I'm not certain where I would get an honest definition of it, it's constantly stated that fascism is militaristic but I question whether that's arm core tennet or just a necessity when fighting zog.