What if it's not the clot shot? | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (47).

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

"I wonder if it's a selective bias in reporting or not."

Same. I have to think that there is definitely selective bias in reporting on both sides. I mean, let's face it. There is.

That helps to muddy the waters, sure. But there's still too much evidence that the shot is killing more people than an approved shot would be allowed to.. and this is from the CDC's own numbers and (I believe) Pfizer's own numbers..

Any drug, no matter what drug it is, is going to cause an adverse effect on some people. So that's not really in question. What's in question is what is the percentage of people, what are those effects, and are they dangerous?

That's not to mention any possible longterm effects, which no one knows until time has passed.. but just for short term stuff, the percentage of adverse reactions (including death) has been well beyond what would be normally deemed as "acceptable" for continuation of trials, much less an approval. They knowingly did this, hid it, lied about it, and then to top it off - attempted it FORCE it on people. THAT is the issue at hand.

Had they wheeled out the vaccine and been honest about what was happening with the tests, I personally wouldn't have had an issue with giving people the option to take it. If people want to try experimental drugs under the umbrella of informed consent, I believe that's a right they should have. But the informed consent piece MUST be there, and there should never be any coercion.

What's funny is how much of a 180 the whole world has made, and no one has really stopped to think about how or why this happened. What I mean is, if you remember early on in Trump's term, he would constantly refer to the concept of "right to try". So like, people with terminal illnesses were being told they weren't allowed to try experimental treatments because those treatments hadn't yet met FDA approval. So clearly, the medical establishment thought this was the way things should be because that's the way things were and had been for so long.. we went from that to "we are going to force you to take this experimental shot." And not a single fucking person I know who took the jab or who is ok with the mandates has stopped to consider the 180 degree turn that happened with that issue in just a few short months. Seriously? You're not even the slightest bit curious as to why we went to a polar-opposite policy in no time at all? But no, they aren't. Fucking zombies everywhere.

*"I wonder if it's a selective bias in reporting or not."* Same. I have to think that there is definitely selective bias in reporting on both sides. I mean, let's face it. There is. That helps to muddy the waters, sure. But there's still too much evidence that the shot is killing more people than an approved shot would be allowed to.. and this is from the CDC's own numbers and (I believe) Pfizer's own numbers.. Any drug, no matter what drug it is, is going to cause an adverse effect on *some people*. So that's not really in question. What's in question is what is the percentage of people, what are those effects, and are they dangerous? That's not to mention any possible longterm effects, which no one knows until time has passed.. but just for short term stuff, the percentage of adverse reactions (including death) has been well beyond what would be normally deemed as "acceptable" for continuation of trials, much less an approval. They knowingly did this, hid it, lied about it, and then to top it off - attempted it FORCE it on people. THAT is the issue at hand. Had they wheeled out the vaccine and been honest about what was happening with the tests, I personally wouldn't have had an issue with giving people the option to take it. If people want to try experimental drugs under the umbrella of informed consent, I believe that's a right they should have. But the informed consent piece MUST be there, and there should never be any coercion. What's funny is how much of a 180 the whole world has made, and no one has really stopped to think about how or why this happened. What I mean is, if you remember early on in Trump's term, he would constantly refer to the concept of "right to try". So like, people with terminal illnesses were being told they weren't allowed to try experimental treatments because those treatments hadn't yet met FDA approval. So clearly, the medical establishment thought this was the way things should be because that's the way things were and had been for so long.. we went from *that* to "we are going to force you to take this experimental shot." And not a single fucking person I know who took the jab or who is ok with the mandates has stopped to consider the 180 degree turn that happened with that issue in just a few short months. Seriously? You're not even the slightest bit curious as to why we went to a polar-opposite policy in no time at all? But no, they aren't. Fucking zombies everywhere.

parent
link