Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

A subverse currently exists on POAL where informed debate is HIGHLY discouraged, either agree with the glowniggers or get banned. How totalitarian.

3 banned users in the 2 days it has existed.

Straight from the https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new page sidebar -

About this sub

This isn't a "free speech" sub.

The 3rd Reich didn't encourage open debate about sexually degenerate communist propaganda; they burned the propaganda.

If you defend gayops here, you will be banned.

PS: Libertarians are useful idiot pussies.

https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new

Isn't this subverse against POAL ToS? Did the owner violate POAL ToS by creating a sub that defies free speech?

AOU, If this kind of subverse abuse is okay by POAL ToS, can I create some too?! And everyone else? See where this would end up? This trend is not a good direction for POAL.

A subverse currently exists on POAL where informed debate is HIGHLY discouraged, either agree with the glowniggers or get banned. How totalitarian. @AOU 3 banned users in the 2 days it has existed. Straight from the https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new page sidebar - #About this sub >This isn't a "free speech" sub. >The 3rd Reich didn't encourage open debate about sexually degenerate communist propaganda; they burned the propaganda. >If you defend gayops here, you will be banned. >PS: Libertarians are useful idiot pussies. https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new Isn't this subverse against POAL ToS? Did the owner violate POAL ToS by creating a sub that defies free speech? AOU, If this kind of subverse abuse is okay by POAL ToS, can I create some too?! And everyone else? See where this would end up? This trend is not a good direction for POAL.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (77).
[–] • 2 pts

I just looked at and I don't think the sub you're talking about violates it. I may be wrong (and will have to clarify) but it's not one of the default subs, so I don't think it has to allow anything it doesn't want to.

[–] • 0 pt

I was under the impression POAL was 100% free speech when I came here years ago. It could be that has changed or I was mistaken.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts
[–] • 1 pt

You need a .gif of some idiot poking a stick in a hornets nest too! Lol!

[–] • 2 pts

It is and this example dose not conflict with that. You're being retarded.

[–] • 0 pt

You're being retarded.

Harsh reply for asking a simple question.

When the bias of the sub owner conflicts with hsrd fact, the sub owner bans you. What's not to love? The sub becomes a safe space circle jerk for like minded anons fearful of honest debate.

[–] • 0 pt

Does. Retard

[–] • 1 pt

Your not reading the replys are you

[–] • 0 pt

I've been working through them in my inbox. 3 remain after this ... then off to see what's under the post ...

[–] • 1 pt

Don't be a kike. This site is not 100% free speech and will never be.

[–] • 1 pt

The only people fighting for censorship here are subversives shills and Jews.

[–] • 0 pt

And in abundance. They don't like me since I've started calling out their relentless bullshit.

[–] • 0 pt

I was under the impression POAL was 100% free speech when I came here years ago. It could be that has changed or I was mistaken.

I'd go with mistaken because no site anywhere is 100% free speech. At least none that I've come across since the BBS days.

[–] • 0 pt

I'd be happy with 98% at this point. VOAT was free speech, I guess I got spoiled.