Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

A subverse currently exists on POAL where informed debate is HIGHLY discouraged, either agree with the glowniggers or get banned. How totalitarian.

3 banned users in the 2 days it has existed.

Straight from the https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new page sidebar -

About this sub

This isn't a "free speech" sub.

The 3rd Reich didn't encourage open debate about sexually degenerate communist propaganda; they burned the propaganda.

If you defend gayops here, you will be banned.

PS: Libertarians are useful idiot pussies.

https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new

Isn't this subverse against POAL ToS? Did the owner violate POAL ToS by creating a sub that defies free speech?

AOU, If this kind of subverse abuse is okay by POAL ToS, can I create some too?! And everyone else? See where this would end up? This trend is not a good direction for POAL.

A subverse currently exists on POAL where informed debate is HIGHLY discouraged, either agree with the glowniggers or get banned. How totalitarian. @AOU 3 banned users in the 2 days it has existed. Straight from the https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new page sidebar - #About this sub >This isn't a "free speech" sub. >The 3rd Reich didn't encourage open debate about sexually degenerate communist propaganda; they burned the propaganda. >If you defend gayops here, you will be banned. >PS: Libertarians are useful idiot pussies. https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new Isn't this subverse against POAL ToS? Did the owner violate POAL ToS by creating a sub that defies free speech? AOU, If this kind of subverse abuse is okay by POAL ToS, can I create some too?! And everyone else? See where this would end up? This trend is not a good direction for POAL.

(post is archived)

[–] [Sticky] • 2 pts

What makes poal a free speech site is I can make a sub and shut you up, you dont have to look at it. Get it yet?

[–] • 1 pt

After all this discussion, yes I get it. The key learning is here you are free to create non-free speech subs and be your own totalitarian, within ToS, if that shit is what flips your skirt up.

[–] • 1 pt

Nice bait post, but you are deeply mistaken about Voat.

Voat was way worse that what you try to paint Poal with.

Voat had plenty of 'user' subs that were banning users just for the lolz.

Voat was filled with brigading shills who could silence anyone with mass-downvotes with the benediction of Putt (who admitted, before he shoah'd the site on Christmas day, he was part of it with an alt account).

On Poal, you can't brigade users to the point where they can't comment/post anywhere/anymore.

Poal is a free speech platform (with a very few set of rules defined in the ToS) and users are free to subscribe to a user sub or block it.

If you don't like a sub, feel free to block it and move on, or even better, make your own.

[–] • 0 pt

I bet you had a laugh watching the action yesterday. My misunderstanding. If I was aware that a POAL sub could be structured to restrict my speech like , I'd long forgotten about it. Now, after much excitement, I won't forget. Yes, POAL is tamer than VOAT, the minimalized down voting/brigading, elimination of porn, great up time, and other features make it a better platform.

I don't want to make my own subs and have the burden of maintaining them, although searching for sub categories that don't yet exist tempt me ... just to have that category established as a repository for breaking news that I post (I.e. "Brazil", " Trump2024", etc) but I don't want to be the one cluttering the list of sub categories. I can usually find a sub that these articles will fit into but at times it's challenging. I like organized and intuitive structure.

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

No it doesn't. The idea that poal is free speech is that there isn't a global set of restrictions. Sub restrictions are fine. Just as if I were to make a sub about bicycles I would ban the fuck out of posts relevant to alligators.

e; Also the owner of that sub is a (((bitcoin))) loving kike who endorses jew controlled digital currency.

[–] • 0 pt

What if the gators can ride bicycles? What if they drag one into a lake?

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not familiar with the rules around sub creation, I've never created one here.

[–] • 0 pt

This has nothing to do with the rules around sub creation. This has to do with handling a sub. Additionally it's always been that free speech is about global rules the admin (AOU) won't curtail. Subs can do as they please (within TOS / the law) as any user of level 6+ (I think 6+) can make a sub if the current one is to their disliking and they feel they could do it better.

[–] • 0 pt

Can you point me to an all inclusive ToS doc with this info? That would be awesome! I looked around earlier but onybfound an updated ToS memo.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts
[–] • 3 pts

Subs are allowed to do what they want as long as they put the rules in the sidebar and it doesn't violate the tos. If you want free speach do it in a different sub.

[–] • 0 pt

Nice. BTW, it's "speech", not "speach".

[–] • 2 pts

Yeah typing from phone and not reading what i write.

[–] • 2 pts

The odd thing about freedom is that it empowers people to do things you're not going to agree with. Things like burn the flag, sit during the pledge, teach CRT, embrace BLM, refuse a customer service, or host a site like poal. You don't have to agree with these things, just understand and respect that freedom can take many forms.

[–] • 2 pts

I just looked at and I don't think the sub you're talking about violates it. I may be wrong (and will have to clarify) but it's not one of the default subs, so I don't think it has to allow anything it doesn't want to.

[–] • 0 pt

I was under the impression POAL was 100% free speech when I came here years ago. It could be that has changed or I was mistaken.

[–] • 2 pts

It is and this example dose not conflict with that. You're being retarded.

[–] • 0 pt

You're being retarded.

Harsh reply for asking a simple question.

When the bias of the sub owner conflicts with hsrd fact, the sub owner bans you. What's not to love? The sub becomes a safe space circle jerk for like minded anons fearful of honest debate.

[–] • 0 pt

Does. Retard

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts
[–] • 1 pt

You need a .gif of some idiot poking a stick in a hornets nest too! Lol!

[–] • 1 pt

Your not reading the replys are you

[–] • 0 pt

I've been working through them in my inbox. 3 remain after this ... then off to see what's under the post ...

[–] • 1 pt

Don't be a kike. This site is not 100% free speech and will never be.

[–] • 1 pt

The only people fighting for censorship here are subversives shills and Jews.

[–] • 0 pt

And in abundance. They don't like me since I've started calling out their relentless bullshit.

[–] • 0 pt

I was under the impression POAL was 100% free speech when I came here years ago. It could be that has changed or I was mistaken.

I'd go with mistaken because no site anywhere is 100% free speech. At least none that I've come across since the BBS days.

[–] • 0 pt

I'd be happy with 98% at this point. VOAT was free speech, I guess I got spoiled.

[–] • 2 pts

It's very simple:

Freedom of speech[2] is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. The right to freedom of expression has been recognized as a human right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights law by the United Nations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

Human rights don't apply to jews since they are not human. KYS faggot.

[–] • 0 pt

1A is still alive in my America, buddy. You are among those threatening it.

[–] • 1 pt

We are talking about Poal, not America.

Also I'm sure that enemies of America are not covered by Constitution, and since you are pushing jewish propaganda - you sure are one, buddy!

[–] • 0 pt

What jewish propaganda? The Q stuff? That's what got you guys started on me. The Q movement was invited here, how quickly you forget! Do you think Q shit would be invited here if it was all jewish slop? Who do you blame for bringing Q here to POAL? Have you persecuted them for doing it? You've got to be a fed, glownigger or one skullfucked dude to be so insecure about your facts about Q that you have to shut down all debate on it.

[–] • 1 pt

I didn't know about this section, but I agree. I am no longer in favor of free speech if having it means that Jews get to spread their bullshit and perversions without having their skulls cracked.

[–] • 0 pt

Then go to and start cracking! The only people who are deathly afraid of free speech are jews and those who have been jewed.

[–] • 2 pts

Jews are exploiting "free speech" and even decided that pornography is "free speech." Yeah, I'm sure the writers of the constitution were gravely concerned about jack off material and not government silencing dissent. What Jews are afraid of is Nazis that shutdown their bullshit.

[–] • 0 pt

Ironically that sub claims to be Nazis - national socialists. I think it's all feds and jidf but who knows. They are adamant in their beliefs and love to shit on everything Trump, Q and more. I think the SCOTUS should revisit the free speech classification for porn, it has destroyed too many American lives over the past 50+ years. Jews seem to control everything that has gone to hell in America, and they aren't done until we're a 3rd world bankrupt country along with the rest of western civilization. Sickening.

[–] • 1 pt

Is this a bait post or are you just that retarded?

[–] • 0 pt

A little bait and apparently a bit naïve. I came from VOAT where there was free speech to discuss and debate. Then to POAL and essentially the same environment in the subs I've traveled.

This sub was created a few days ago and you see the sidebar rules. I've debated these guys about the misinfo they claim about Q in other subverses on some of the same topics now posted in this new sub. They disparage me and all others in the Q movement, repost misinformation about Q and essentially won't allow any proQ discussion or debate there. I didn't know that was fine by ToS, I thought all subs here were free speech as long as you stay on subject for that sub. I stand corrected. It sure was a wild afternoon regardless.

[–] • 1 pt

Cmon bro. You serious. What would be the point of subs then? Might as well just have one big message board. Stick to lurking.

[–] • 0 pt

Subs organize posts by subject. To mix them all would be disorganized. I wanted to challenge some of the Q related misinfo crap within that Nazi sub - but under the authoritarian sidebar rules and board owner's predisposition to push these false narratives, I would not be allowed free speech to debate their lies. I never encountered this situation on POAL before. I didn't realize ToS was fine with it. It seems antithetical to free speech. Life goes on.

[–] • 1 pt

whaa is abusing mod powers

Also poal

Guy diluting natsoc messaging by driving home shitlib think tank "operation trust" that wasn't used until after Jan 6 to try an induce a wypipo chimpout the Biden admin could clamp down on, as seen by the occupation of the us capitol by thousands of nasty girls, which would have cemented the administration's power indefinitely and demonize anything right of Mitt Romney

This is fine.jpg

Load more (2 replies)