WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

229

Since genocide means the deliberate and systematic destruction of a specific group of people it does not feel comprehensive enough.

Mass murder just doesn't sound right.

If there was a nice catchy term for what's going on it might wake more people up...

Since genocide means the deliberate and systematic destruction of a specific group of people it does not feel comprehensive enough. Mass murder just doesn't sound right. If there was a nice catchy term for what's going on it might wake more people up...

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts (edited )

"Genocide" is good enough. The term seeming to be insufficient for what is occurring is due to it being associated almost exclusively in modern times with the kike holohoax fiction. If one wants to use this term, it immediately brings their lie to mind and thus dominates any discussion of the matter. This is intentional on the part of kikes.

Further, Whites do not make up half of the population of the planet. We are the minority. The complete physical and ideological perversion and eradication of everything related to Whites is the goal of kikes; other groups being made fewer and less capable as a result of their ongoing genocide of us is simply a "side effect" that will cause the remaining populations to be pliant and controllable slaves. Our genocide is their goal.

The term "genocide" was coined by a jew named Raphael Lemkin in the 1940s as part of their then-developing and still-ongoing holohoax narrative. He was the founder of the Genocide Convention.

Partial quotation from the image:

"Generally speaking, "genocide" does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accompanied by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended, rather, to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.

The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups."


"There are many critically-acclaimed laureates that define "genocide" essentially the same as Lemkin. I'll list only 5 more [definitions]:"

United Nations General Assembly "Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy -in whole or in part- a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

John Cox "Genocide differs from other mass crimes against humanity and atrocities by its ambition. Genocide aims to not only eliminate individual members of the targeted group, but to destroy the group's ability to maintain its social and cultural cohesion and, thus, its existence as a group. Because perpetrators very rarely provide explicit statements of genocidal intent, this intent can be uncovered by examining policies, actions, and outcomes, as well as the guiding ideology."

Henry Huttenbach "Genocide is any act that puts the very existence of a group in jeopardy."

Irving Louis Horowitz (obviously a kike) "A systematic effort over time to liquidate a national population, usually a minority, and functions as a fundamental policy to assure conformity and participation of the citizenry."

Tony Barta "...genocidal society -as distinct from genocidal state- is one in which the bureaucratic apparatus might officially be directed to protect innocent people, but in which a whole race is nevertheless subject to remorseless pressures of destruction inherent in the very nature of the society."


"By comparing these definitions of genocide with the details of mainstream social actions against Whites, it is obvious and irrefutable that currently there is occurring a White Genocide."

[–] 0 pt

See your point. I was not referring to whites exclusively. Although it does seem like it's open season..

Just wanted to know how to best describe the ongoing situation.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

To be more direct, I believe "genocide" would still be best as that is what is occurring.

I tried to address why that term seems like it is insufficient for what is occurring due to the perversion of the term at the hands of kikes*, as well as attempted to outline the details of what the question revolves around; that it isn't a genocide of half the planet, it is a genocide of Whites with others also being reduced being "a happy bonus" for kikes. All kikes view all non-jews as cattle; merely animals in a human form. To them, all non-Whites are entirely expendable, particularly so if their reduction or erasure is a requirement for the eradication and erasure of Whites.

*(I realize the term was coined by a kike primarily for use in pushing their lie, but the actions and events that define the term makes it universally applicable for use to describe all instances that fit the definition. My saying that they perverted the term's use is that they made it into being exclusively acceptable and applicable for use solely for pushing their lie and any attempts to properly apply it to real, actual instances of genocide that did happen and is currently happening is what they've perverted.)

[–] 0 pt

The ongoing situation is Whites only though. As he pointed out anything else it's a dude effect.