Can't say you're wrong. The wealth, prosperity and luxury that Whites have created have tended to make Whites softer. Good times make weak men.
I think that in some sense older people (or even all people) lag behind a bit. Older people grew up in a Whiter world with more trust and honesty, some of them probably havent fully adjusted to how quickly things have become worse. But some can contrast what life was like decennia ago and can compare it to what it is like now to see how civilization had deteriorated.
IMHO it's civilization that led to the deterioration. People tend to blame brown people for becoming like bugs that live in shantytowns and seemingly only exist to shit out new larvae all day while stuffing high-caloric crap into their mouth-openings until they become too fat to move, from when on they start to receive heroic amounts of medical care by highly trained individuals that dedicated their adult life to "saving human lifes" just to keep those diabetic fuckers breathing.
The thing is, that those fuckers wouldn't be alive in the first place, if civilization wouldn't feed them. And those that would live, would be hunter-gatherers or subsidence-farmers, and wouldn't be a problem at all.
When getting uppity they'd be shot in self-defense, just like the indians were. I'm not saying, that I think that it's good how the Indians were treated - to the contrary, what happened to them was absolutely horrible. My point is, that "being shot, no question asked" is the normal treatment of people that are aggressive and foreign to your group. And even the fact that this doesn't happen anymore is "civilisational progress".
So civilization seems to be what's to blame.
Exactly. Caring about the wellbeing of the lesser races and criminals is a luxury that can be afforded during good times. In bad times no such luxury can be afforded because the focus must be 100% on survival, sending money to niggers does not aid survival, and one has to be hyper sensitive to potential enemies which individuals of other races usually are (genetic interest).
It weird how wealth is the goal, but wealth is also the thing that is to blame for many of our problems. It doesn't add up. Did we have the wrong goal?
I have no solution for this. Maybe civilization has to crash periodically so people need to get their priorities straight? Another thing would be to figure out how to keep norms fixed for eternity but that may not even be possible.
IMHO the solution to slavery is to kill all slaves, not to free them, because, being slaves, they'll re-create their own form of slavery. My point of contention to the hard-times-good-men thesis is, that I think, that a notable portion of the white populace has been bred into complacent cattle whose sole biological niche is being human cattle, which of course is the substrate on which civilization grows. So they are unable to change.
Hence, if the hard-times-create-good-people thesis works at all, it works by creating mass-casualties that predominantly hit those, that rely upon the system. And that's not just some cultural change, but large-scale destruction.
Another thing this thesis ignores is, that most people are conservatives in so far that they are trying to maintain the conditions under which they've grown up. However, with public schools and organized brainwashing of children having been a thing since after WW2 (they attempted to change the educational system to reduce militarism and educate enlightened voters, but of course only managed to give society a heavy leftward spin) you have to have conditions awful enough to overcome this conservative bias, that has been their moral compass and integral part of their identity since childhood. Well, and when you consider, how much people resist to overcome their core-beliefs even when they're wrong, IMHO it would pretty much require something on the scale of a fully-fledged nuclear war to snap people out of this.
Well, and if the universe manages to bring about such large-scale destruction, most people might still not snap out of it, but rather choose from a multitude of religious, political and other wrong paths that will lead them nowhere. With people now being unable to see what is happening and what has to be done about it, even though they're having all the time in the world and the answer is right in front of their faces, there's absolutely no reason to assume, that people start making better choices when their level of stress increases. Which is another argument for mass-casualties being the only arc of redemption.
(post is archived)