> Well, and when you consider, how much people resist to overcome their core-beliefs even when they're wrong, IMHO it would pretty much require something on the scale of a fully-fledged nuclear war to snap people out of this. So many people are sheep just following what they hear and trying to *fit in*. They believe in the latest *trends* even if they completely and directly contradict other opinions they still hold (or discarded at a whim) that they were spoon fed by media. People went from disliking homosexuals and trannies to liking them because *trends* changed. I might be wrong, because I don't seem to take into account that people also tend to conservative and don't like to change their minds, but I think it could be possible to *reprogram* the sheep. If a sheep starts to feel that their views are seen as unacceptable minority views then I think a lot of them would be tempted to switch. Whether enough non-sheep, the true actors, will awaken and take action (take over government and/or media) before a mass-casualties situation I don't know. Time will tell I guess. Weimar to Third Reich happened pretty quickly though? > With people now being unable to see what is happening and what has to be done about it, even though they're having all the time in the world and the answer is right in front of their faces, there's absolutely no reason to assume, that people start making better choices when their level of stress increases. It is disappointing that people are so slow, but I've seen people get red-pilled quickly when they have been personally affected so that their quality of their life went down (such as inability to sleep because nigger music or niggers constantly roaming around and screaming in the night). > Which is another argument for mass-casualties being the only arc of redemption. Do you see any other way?