Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

866

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

Look to Rome.

The Plebs and the Twelve Tables.

One of the first acts by the Plebian Tribunes in Rome was to demand the laws were written down. Before that, the slaves were simply living in constant fear and abuse by a system they did not understand at all.

[–] • 3 pts

My understanding is that the plebs eventually walked out of the city. This act deprived the city of the actual laboring class that produced the food and prompted the patricians to create the office of Tribune of the Plebs. The Tribune of the Plebs was given the power to veto acts of the Senate altogether and they eventually gained the power to present legislation directly to the Plebian Assembly. Gaius Marius, as Consul, bribed a Tribune to use this ability to introduce legislation to his benefit, namely by stripping command of the Numidian war from Quintus Caecilius Metellus and giving it to himself. Marius would repeat this legislative tactic to attempt the same usurpation of command against Lucius Cornelius Sulla who was going to fight Mithridates, King of Pontus. This lead Sulla to march on Rome and inspired the first Roman Civil War. One could make the argument that the overpowered Tribune of the Plebs office was responsible.

[–] • 4 pts

The fight club bathroom scene.

"Don't fuck with us"

[–] • 1 pt

Sulla restored order to Rome by winning the first civil war and becoming dictator. His conservative reforms stripped the Tribunate of its power and heavily favored the patrician elite. These reforms would be slowly chipped away over the next 20 years until Julius Caesar, a nephew-in-law of Gaius Marius, reinvigorated the populist Marian faction, plunging Rome into another civil war that would transform the Republic into a Military Autocracy.

[–] • 3 pts

Laws of physics?

I mean, it's unfair no matter how you look at it; no law it's as fair as the law of the jungle, with law it's as fair as a rigged casino

Sure there's an in between... For how long?

...

I've come to the conclusion that, in this world, you can only displace evil, you can't get rid of it

[–] • 3 pts

Your comment reads like a fucking meth head spouting out retarded shit that they thought was profound when they were high.

[–] • 1 pt

>Joined 3y ago (0 follower) 8 posts

Hello faggot...

[–] • 2 pts

I knew you'd take another hit that fast, lol.

[–] • 3 pts

Yes. Laws are only rules to justify a bureaucracy of enforcement on the controlled population by those in control.

[–] • 2 pts

I see it as this: Laws are just the compromise people reach when they get tired of killing each other and I agree, they always favor the party with the stronger position.

[–] • 1 pt

>Turbo normie

Really, you could have wrote nothing it would have been just the same

[–] • 2 pts

Damn, you are so desperate for attention. The stock buzzword usage on your part is hilarious given the irony. But then again everyone appears to be a normie if compared to your autistic, meth addled sperging.

[–] • 2 pts

I think the Gideon v. Wainwright decision already covered the idea of having an appointed advocate. Your suggestion seems to embody the spirit of civilization in an ideal world. However, there will be many people that still require an advocate of some kind. Yes, these advocates have become very different over time. It would be interesting to see some sort of periodic judicial reset overhauls to counteract the effects of bureaucratic entropy.

[–] • 1 pt

However, there will be many people that still require an advocate of some kind.

Your father, brother, cousin, etc...

[–] • 1 pt

I was referring to people such as yourself. That's why you didn't understand.

[–] • 2 pts

Yes but first off most of our laws should be abolished

[–] • 1 pt

Yes.

Complications of the law cause loopholes, which induce legalistic mental salad excuses.

kikes survive by corrupting the simple with complication. They do this because they create nothing. Mental salad causes complication. Thats why kikes love it so much.

The modern practice of law is borne by complication.

So if you eradicate the complication, you erase the jew from legal practice.

On principle, simple is better than complex. It's how Whites have achieved and created for thousands of years.

[–] • 1 pt

Every bill - which could conceivably contain multiple laws - should be understandable and readable by the layperson. This is already law. The Constitution is not the "supreme law" of the land. There's higher law, common law. From which it all derives. These things are well established but not followed because jews.

[–] • 1 pt

It's not possible. Why? Because of how people split hairs.

You can't just say "don't kill people" because then anti-gun people start jailing people for self defense. You can't say "except for in cases of self-defense" because then leftists will justify killing rich people as "defense" against their chicanery. It goes on and on. That's why laws have to be retardedly specific.