I tried to install something yesterday, can't remember now but it wouldn't install. The make file would work, did a search and found that the idiots on the site that created the files didn't compile the shit right. I think the problem you are having is that the people are not competent like in the past. I was installing themes for XP and found a great one. The dumbass forgot to make a theme file for the theme and had great art but didn't make the file so the theme was usable. I was fuming that something that is so necessary for any theme even in windows with the theme file was not there. In windows though I was good enough to take another theme file and edit it for the theme I needed it for and it always worked but I don't have the experience enough in Linux to do that YET. Always leaning though so I'll be great by 10 years I imagine.
Right. Those people are inept. The problem is the people I deal with are also inept, but if I bother to tell them they packaged their software poorly I end up looking like the dummy when they say "don't you know how to use yarn"
The whole point of packages is that people don't need to know your shit.
You would think that packaging things for C, a lot of the complexity of the problem would bleed through to the user, but it doesn't. Yet now we have high level languages that let you write the same code in 10 lines that would take thousands of lines in C. Which is really great. But then they have even less excuse to pass on complexity to the user. They are taking the most uncomplicated thing and wrapping it in complexity.
(post is archived)