WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

508
https://truthsocial.com/@CannCon/posts/109345369816709209

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

The AZ election process is a joke and they should be mocked for the farce that it is. Just like in 2020, no one can show where all these ballots came from, it's a mystery.

[–] 2 pts

I like that the woman running the elections in AZ is also the person in charge of the election. She refused to recuse herself, nothing to see here move along...

[–] 3 pts

It's almost like they looked at a list of red flags for election fraud, and made sure they checked off every single one.

Frankly, I believe they are rubbing our noses in it because they want someone to do something.

They are baiting us.

[–] 5 pts

She won but they stole victory, so kinda?

[–] 5 pts

Yep. Hobbs has "won". The rig was obvious.

[–] 4 pts

Yup, vote harder goyium.

[–] 3 pts

it's total bs, but there are precedents being set that should scare the fuck out of anyone who isn't a raging lefty.

1) Ballot harvesting is not going away. It's total crap, but unfortunately this rigs the system in favor of liberals, who start voting in Sept/Oct. It should be repealed, but it's not going to be in blue states, so conservatives (do they actually conserve anything?) need to adopt or they are finished forever.

2) The dems have now run a candidate in Hobbs who flat out refused to debate... and won. That should be disqualifying on its face, but hey we're talking about ppl that want to fuck kids and define themselves by their vaccine status.

3) The dems have run a candidate who is objectively mentally handicapped, never had an actual job and lived off his parents trust fund into his 40's and pretends to be a union guy in Fetterman, which his inability to hear,interpret,process and respond was beyond apparent in his one and only debate....and won.

So this leaves the future WIDE OPEN for who they can run. It's literally anyone. they don't have to debate, be intelligent, have a plan or really do anything except be in lock step with the looney left.

I think all we can do is fortify red states and use them as an example as to how bad liberal policies are. It sucks, I hate saying it, it's going to take a while, but it's the only way I see forward without a breakup or war. And on peaceful divorce, the ppl running the dem party are smart and will never just give up that tax base. Someone has to fund illegals, ooops sorry I mean newly created dem voters

[–] 2 pts

Do you think we could convince Brazil to let us start a little America somewhere within its borders?

[+] [deleted] 2 pts

I would be way easier to kill the few hundred traitors than move millions of people

[–] 0 pt

Few hundred doesn’t even account for the paid internet trolls and you’ll never find them let alone the rest. It’s not just 100 standing out in a field.

The trolls and low level retards don't matter, they will have no immunity from crimes and be arrested for breaking the law once the top corruption assholes are gone

[–] 2 pts

Coming to a state near you!

[–] 2 pts

They are trying to do two things - 1, make her lose. 2, kill all momentum she might have had if they can't pull off 1.

[–] 1 pt

Good grief.

[–] 1 pt

It's what they did in the primary to her.

[–] 0 pt

I'm not remembering what happened then.

[–] 2 pts

Yes.

[–] 3 pts

Just what many predicted then, that it would be stolen.

[–] 2 pts

Just what many predicted then, that it would be stolen.

Thanks for pointing that out, Captain Obvious.

[–] 0 pt

Lol, not a problem. But I am talking about certain people specifically, you wouldn't be interested.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

>Just what many predicted then, that it would be stolen.

And now we KNOW why nobody's going to do shit about it https://pic8.co/sh/LVzOog.jpg

It's no longer a mere suspicion, it's a fact now, the GOP won't do shit about it because they profit from it

[–] 1 pt

I have no idea, but she's obviously going to. It's rigged. Surely, you know that by now.

[–] 0 pt

>Surely, you know that by now.

What makes you think I don't?

[–] 0 pt

I mean, you did ask if the inevitable was happening.

[–] 0 pt

I was asking if it was being projected (yet) is all.

[–] 1 pt

What? Are you telling me the person in charge of the vote counting... "won" the election? That's so unexpected.

Load more (5 replies)