No. The group that "...tricked the Romans into killing Jesus" weren't jews, they were pharisees. The "jew" in the bible isn't a pharisee or a turkroach, they're Judeans and (((intentionally))) mistranslated.
Hell the Khazars probably killed off the original jews.
The turkroaches are the original jews. They're still the same as they were then. Why people still believe these lies is uncomfortably painful to try and think about. None of this is confusing and it's all in plain sight.
>No. The group that "...tricked the Romans into killing Jesus" weren't jews, they were pharisees.
Anticlutch BS number 9998765
They were sadducees you fucking ass, you can't even tell the difference, you bullshit windmill
In first-century Israel, Sadducees were a religious faction that wielded societal power in nearly every aspect except military—and for that they had the backing of their Roman benefactors. These were the Jewish aristocrats of their day, known as much for their wealth and corruption as for their religious devotion.
Although we can’t know for certain the origins of their name, a common belief is that it was derived from the name of prominent Old Testament High Priest, Zadok (2 Samuel 15:23-29; 1 Kings 2:35). Role of Sadducees in the Bible
In Jesus’ time, Sadducees controlled the two most important institutions of Jewish society: The Jerusalem Temple (known as Herod’s Temple) and the Sanhedrin.
The Sanhedrin was the governing body for both religious and legal issues of the Jews. The leader of the Sanhedrin was a High Priest given king-like authority—and was almost always a Sadducee.
For instance, Annas and his son-in-law Caiaphas are two High Priests named in the New Testament (see Matthew 26:3 and Acts 4:6). Both were Sadducees—and both played critical roles in the execution of Jesus.
None of this is confusing? You're being disingenuous, it is very confusing, and very controversial, why would you say that?
(post is archived)