This is a good question - how do we judge who is not on their side. You make some good points. Unfortunately, there is no single litmus test so you have to look at the entire picture. This sometimes takes awhile but it is worth it.
The controlled opposition aspect of the ZOG system makes it a lot harder to judge. This the case with your example AOC, who is actually . I'm sure her role is something along the line of victimizing israel and making seem as if israel doesn't completely own the senate. As you know AOC also has shit leftist political views so you could cast her off anyway. Same goes for anyone who spouts (((leftist))) ideology. Leftist Ideology is inherently jewish and depraved.
On the other hand, because their political views are less shitty, "conservatives" like Matt Walsh and harder to judge to the untrained eye. He may be "tearing" through leftist ideology, but like you said, he is also a shabbat goy and has defended jews and their barbaric practices several times. To me it seem like he essentially plays as a gatekeeper for Shapiro. As I have stated before, if you on on the side of the jews, you are helping the bad guys win.
Also, while it may seem like the controlled opposition thing is just a trope or excuse, I would have to disagree judging by the collective actions of both Republicans and Democrats.
As for your last point, there is difference between simply being associated with jews and vehemently defending them, their actions and creating special councils to protect them. I guess you could say that the litmus test for judging some politicians isn't jew hating, but jew defending. Like you said, it is probably very hard to avoid association, but defending them constantly is a problem.
I am young so I may be off on some things but this is just what I see in politics today.
(post is archived)