Don't be a dumb nigger. I'm not supporting fluoride. I am saying that the claims of superpowers from non-calcified pineal glands sounds like false information with no factual evidence of such to be found from credible research. You are doing your kike tricks to twist my words into anti-White and pro-kike positions, which you always do. Show me real proof of enlightenment by the masses from the past. Be sure to factor in the truths that life was much simpler back then and people had less knowledge overall to have to deal with. Don't confuse a few prominent names being highly creative and intelligent with the entirety of people on the planet at the time. If everyone were so damned enlightened back then, then why did they not finish off the kikes and niggers, let women vote, stop immigration, get rid of the (((central banks))), not get into kike wars and let the (((government))) grow into tyrannical, authoritarian proportions? Dumb people have always existed and your proof of that.

Too bad the real counterclutch is dead. He'd set your ass straight on this you LARPing kike faggot.

So you're using the abstract of paper as your proof?

Abstract Melatonin secretion by the pineal gland has been reported to be affected by exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). In an initial investigation to determine if calcifications commonly found in the pineal gland could respond to EMFs by a transducer mechanism, studies were conducted to ascertain if pineal tissues were piezoelectric. Second harmonic generation (SHG) measurements showed that pineal tissues contained noncentrosymmetric crystals, thus proving the presence of piezoelectricity. Both mulberry-like and faceted crystalline calcifications were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Some of the calcifications had compositions similar to that of hydroxyapatite; others contained a high concentration of aluminum.

That abstract literally says that the calcifications are what they suspect could be piezoelectric and not the gland itself as you suggested. You couldn't even read the text correctly and got it backwards. It says what I said. Also, this is all you have to go on? Anyone can write a paper and get it in some journal, even in 1996 when this was published. It doesn't mean there is any truth or rigor in the "science". You just like this paper because it lines up with your world view. You need to be skeptical and find more information that goes in other directions and weigh the information present yourself before applying your bias and desire for a specific outcome. You're not using science; you're using fee fees.

But of course the other jew sleeper himself.